What reform party policies would do to women?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Reform UK’s pitch to women centres on “women’s safety,” local policing and family wellbeing, while critics point to votes against workplace sexual-harassment protections and plans to scrap the Equality Act 2010 and DE&I rules—moves that campaigners say would roll back legal protections for women and other marginalised groups [1] [2] [3]. Independent observers and opposition outlets call Reform’s women-focused messaging “stagecraft” or a “sham,” noting scant policy detail on domestic abuse, coercive control, prosecution rates or structural gender inequality [4] [5].
1. What Reform says it will do: security and “hyper-localism”
Reform publicly emphasises women’s safety via a “hyper-localism” approach—stronger local policing and safer communities—portrayed as directly beneficial to women’s day-to-day security [1]. The party has also run targeted campaigns such as “Women for Reform” and elevated female spokespeople in an effort to broaden appeal to women voters [6] [7].
2. What Reform has pledged that affects women’s rights
Reform’s manifesto and public commentary include policy pledges with direct consequences for women: a promise to eliminate the Equality Act 2010 and to scrap Diversity, Equality and Inclusion (DE&I) rules—measures that currently underpin legal protections and workplace safeguards for women and other marginalised groups [3]. Campaigners argue those changes would weaken recourse for sex- and gender-based discrimination [3].
3. Voting record and concrete policy omissions
Critics highlight concrete actions inconsistent with a “protect women” claim: Reform voted against the Employment Rights Bill designed to help prevent workplace sexual harassment, according to watchdog commentary [2]. Observers and campaign groups also note Reform’s conferences and press events focused on safety lacked substantive policy on the main drivers of violence against women and girls—domestic abuse, coercive control and low rape-prosecution rates [5] [2].
4. Messaging versus substance: stagecraft and image management
Multiple outlets characterise Reform’s outreach to women as image-led. Coverage of party events and panels suggests female candidates are used to project protectionist messaging while internal remarks by party figures—such as comments about Muslim women in burqas—undercut equality rhetoric and raise concerns about discrimination [4] [2]. Critics call some events “stagecraft” or a “sham,” arguing they trade on emotion rather than policy detail [4] [5].
5. Political consequences for different groups of women
If Reform follows through on scrapping the Equality Act and DE&I, available reporting ties those moves to weakened legal safeguards for transgender women and other marginalised women, and to reduced workplace protections [3] [2]. Reform’s focus on migrants as a source of threat—promoted by some party figures—has been called scapegoating that diverts attention from the statistical reality that intimate partners commit most sexual violence [2].
6. Electoral strategy and women voters’ response
Reform’s leadership has attempted to broaden its gender appeal: they secured a female MP via a by‑election and invested in women-facing campaigning, and some reporting suggests that has nudged female support though a gender gap persists—polling shows Reform underperforming with women by several points in aggregated trackers [7] [8]. Observers note the party remains perceived as male-dominated, and that the outreach may be partly tactical [7] [4].
7. How to read competing claims and the limits of available reporting
Available sources document Reform’s pledges to repeal equality legislation and the party’s voting record on harassment protections [3] [2], and they include critiques calling the safety messaging insubstantial [5]. What is not found in current reporting is a full legislative roadmap from Reform showing how new policing or family policies would be implemented in practice or independent modelling of the net effect on women’s legal protections—available sources do not mention a detailed implementation plan or impact assessment (not found in current reporting).
8. Bottom line for voters and policymakers
Reform’s stated policy emphasis on “safety” will likely translate into law-and-order measures that the party argues help women, but their simultaneous promises to abolish the Equality Act and DE&I and to vote against workplace sexual‑harassment measures create a clear trade-off: more policing-focused responses alongside dismantling legal protections that many experts say underpin women’s equality at work and in public life [1] [3] [2]. Sources disagree on intent: party materials present protectionist aims [1] [6], while critics view the approach as opportunistic and potentially harmful to durable gender equality [4] [5].
Limitations: this analysis relies on the cited reportage, party materials and advocacy commentary in the supplied sources; the detailed legislative texts, impact studies and unpublished party plans are not provided in these documents (not found in current reporting).