What racist policies has Reform UK been accused of promoting and by whom?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Reform UK has been accused by politicians, campaign groups and media outlets of promoting racist policies and tolerating racist individuals — accusations tied chiefly to the party’s hardline immigration rhetoric, candidates’ social‑media posts, and remarks by leader Nigel Farage; examples include calls to prioritise "indigenous" Britons over migrants and allegations about schoolchildren in Glasgow, and multiple councillors suspended or expelled after racist posts were exposed [1] [2] [3] [4]. Critics range from Labour politicians and the anti‑racism group Hope Not Hate to national newspapers and broadcasters; Reform and its leaders insist the party is not racist and have launched internal investigations in some cases [5] [6] [7].
1. How critics define the alleged “racist policies” — immigration and cultural protection
Accusations focus less on a single written manifesto clause and more on Reform UK’s persistent anti‑immigration posture and rhetoric framed as cultural defence — critics say this produces policies and campaigning that treat migrants and ethnic minorities as threats, for example Farage’s public framing of immigration as a “big issue” and criticisms that Reform’s language amounts to a cultural‑protection agenda [4] [1]. Commentators and opponents interpret such framing as policy intent to restrict migrants’ rights and favour “indigenous” populations; Reform disputes the characterization and denies institutional racism [1] [4].
2. Individuals and groups making the accusations
Accusers include Labour politicians such as John Healey and Keir Starmer, anti‑racism organisations like Hope Not Hate, national broadcasters and newspapers (BBC, Guardian, Sky), and local MPs and councillors who have publicly demanded action; Hope Not Hate led calls for resignations after alleging racist social‑media posts by Reform councillors [5] [3] [7] [6]. Polling cited by media also shows substantial public perception that Reform is racist, which opponents use to bolster their claims [8].
3. Examples cited by critics: councillors’ posts and candidate withdrawals
Concrete episodes driving accusations are the exposure of social‑media posts by Staffordshire council leader Ian Cooper and others, where detractors say posts called migrants “intent on colonising the UK” or used slurs — leading to internal probes, membership revocations and suspension of candidates [2] [3] [7]. During the 2024/2025 election cycles Reform withdrew support from at least three parliamentary candidates after racist and homophobic remarks surfaced, a sequence political opponents cited as evidence of embedded bigotry [5].
4. Allegations directed at Nigel Farage personally and their political impact
Beyond party policy, dozens of former school contemporaries and media investigations have accused Nigel Farage of racist and antisemitic behaviour in his youth and of making recent statements (such as comments about Glasgow pupils) that critics call racist; Farage denies malicious intent and rejects the labels, while party figures have sometimes responded by accusing accusers of lying or misremembering events [4] [6] [9]. Media and political reaction frames these personal allegations as amplifying doubts about whether Reform can govern a multi‑ethnic nation [8].
5. Reform’s responses and the existence of competing narratives
Reform UK and its leaders consistently deny being racist, argue that charges are politically motivated, and have at times launched internal investigations or revoked memberships [7] [6]. Richard Tice publicly called accusers “liars” and Farage has attacked broadcasters’ coverage, presenting a counter‑narrative that the party is being unfairly smeared [6]. Available sources show both the allegations and these denials but do not contain a formal adjudication proving party‑wide racist policy — reporting documents incidents, accusations and internal disciplinary moves [5] [3] [7].
6. What reporting does — and does not — show
Reporting establishes multiple instances where individual Reform figures made or were linked to racist or bigoted remarks and that critics interpret party rhetoric as racist policy‑direction; sources document candidate drops, suspensions and membership revocations following exposés [5] [3] [7]. Available sources do not mention a single, universally adopted Reform UK policy text explicitly labelled “racist” by an independent adjudicator; nor do they show a legal finding that the party as a corporate body has enacted racially discriminatory laws (not found in current reporting).
7. Why this matters for voters and institutions
Opponents argue that tolerance of racist language among candidates and a political platform centred on sharply limiting immigration undermines Reform’s claim to be fit to govern a diverse society; supporters counter that the party represents legitimate concerns about immigration and national identity and accuse critics of politicised smears [1] [6]. Journalistic coverage repeatedly places emphasis on the reputational and electoral consequences of these accusations rather than a settled legal or policy verdict [8] [5].
Limitations: this analysis relies only on the supplied reporting excerpts and links; it summarizes documented accusations, responses and outcomes up to the dates in those reports and does not claim to cover every allegation or internal party action beyond these sources [5] [2] [3] [4] [7] [6].