Is Reform UK party accused of promoting racist policies?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
A range of mainstream outlets, unions and polls report that Reform UK is widely accused of promoting racist policies and hosting candidates with racist comments: a YouGov/ITV Peston poll found 47% of Britons say Reform is “generally racist” (46% say its policies are racist) [1]. Major organisations — the National Education Union and campaign groups —have explicitly labelled the party “racist” or “far‑right and racist” citing its immigration platform and candidates’ posts [2] [3] [4]. At the same time Reform and leader Nigel Farage deny the party is racist and say they are defending national interests [5].
1. Public perception: poll evidence and the scale of concern
Public polling captures widespread concern: a YouGov survey for ITV Peston reports roughly four in ten Britons view Reform UK, its policies and its voters as “generally racist” (47%, 46% and 43% respectively) — a plurality that media and rivals cite when framing the debate [1]. Commentators note this perception matters politically because it shapes whether Reform can grow beyond a devoted core into a broader electoral force [6].
2. Target of the accusations: immigration policies singled out
The party’s proposed immigration and citizenship changes are the most-cited source of the charge. Labour and other critics point to plans to revoke indefinite leave to remain, require settled immigrants to apply for citizenship or face deportation, and bar non‑citizens from benefits; senior Labour figures labelled those proposals “racist” and “immoral,” and Sky News and other outlets record those exchanges [7] [8]. Critics say the substance and rhetoric of those policies scapegoat migrants and ethnic minorities [3].
3. Incidents and candidate conduct: local examples that fuel national claims
Reporting and investigations have uncovered multiple Reform candidates and local officials with offensive social‑media posts or remarks. The BBC and The Guardian cite incidents including candidates warned over racist and sexist tweets and a council leader allegedly using explicitly racist language; these instances prompted internal investigations and suspensions [9] [10]. Campaign groups such as Hope Not Hate highlighted that some candidates “posted hate, pushed far‑right conspiracies and praised extremists,” deepening the complaints [9].
4. Institutional and campaign pushback: unions and anti‑racism groups weigh in
The largest teaching union, the NEU, passed motions calling Reform “far‑right and racist,” arguing the party’s “hardline policies on immigration and its ‘campaigns against migrants’” justify that label [2] [3]. Anti‑racism campaigners such as Stand Up To Racism explicitly target Reform, distributing leaflets and organising to oppose its growth [4]. These organisations frame their actions as defensive against a party they see as mobilising xenophobia for political gain [11].
5. Reform’s response and competing narratives
Reform and Nigel Farage dispute the “racist” label and argue their agenda is patriotic rather than bigoted; in coverage embedded with Reform councillors, party figures deny being racist and cast policies as protecting national interests [5]. Commentators and some centrist voices urge caution in applying the term — for example, figures in Labour have been criticised for tactical use of the “r‑word” — showing an active debate about whether policy criticism should be framed as racism [7] [12].
6. Where reporting diverges and what is left unaddressed
Sources consistently link Reform’s immigration platform and specific individuals’ remarks to accusations of racism [3] [9]. Where sources diverge is on intent and scale: Reform’s defenders say the party is not racist [5], while unions, campaign groups and many journalists present the party as actively stoking xenophobia [2] [4]. Available sources do not mention systematic evidence that every Reform policy was drafted with explicitly racial intent beyond critics’ characterisations; they also do not present internal party memos proving such intent (not found in current reporting).
7. Why it matters: political consequence and credibility
The debate has immediate political stakes: opponents argue Reform’s policies and some members undermine social cohesion and target minorities [3], while Reform seeks to broaden its vote share and reject “far‑right” branding [5]. Polling suggests the public perception of racism is a tangible barrier to wider acceptance; analysts warn that reputational damage could limit Reform’s ability to attract more moderate voters even as core supporters dismiss the charge [1] [6].
Limitations: this account relies solely on the supplied reporting, which documents public opinion, union motions, individual misconduct cases and Reform’s denials; fuller legal or academic causal analysis of the party’s policies and long‑term effects is not included in these sources (available sources do not mention such comprehensive studies).