Reiner's 'reaction' to attempts to murder Trump
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
President Donald Trump posted a Truth Social message after the Dec. 14–15, 2025 killings of Rob Reiner and his wife in which he suggested Reiner’s death was linked to “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” a claim that authorities and several news outlets say is unsubstantiated and drew bipartisan condemnation [1] [2] [3]. Police have arrested the Reiners’ 32‑year‑old son and investigators have released no evidence tying the couple’s politics to the killings; multiple outlets report Republicans and conservative figures publicly rebuked the president’s post [4] [5] [1].
1. Trump’s post and its substance — blunt politicization in the immediate aftermath
Trump wrote that Reiner “was known to have driven people CRAZY” and that his death was “reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind‑crippling disease known as TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME,” a message widely reported and quoted by major outlets including Axios, AP and The New York Times [1] [2] [3]. Those outlets describe the post as an explicit attempt to connect Reiner’s political criticism of Trump to the murders; Trump later defended his remarks in public comments [2] [4].
2. What investigators have said — no evidence of a political motive reported
Law enforcement arrested the Reiners’ 32‑year‑old son on suspicion of murder and have treated the deaths as homicides; reporting notes police have released little information and have not linked the killings to Reiner’s politics [2] [5] [3]. The New York Times and AP both emphasize there is “no indication” from authorities that political beliefs motivated the killings [3] [2].
3. Reaction across the political spectrum — rare GOP pushback
The president’s message prompted immediate backlash from across the political spectrum, including some Republicans who broke with Trump: Rep. Thomas Massie called the comment “inappropriate and disrespectful” and former Trump lawyer Jenna Ellis said it should be condemned, while a range of celebrities, lawmakers and commentators criticized the president for politicizing a family tragedy [1] [4] [5]. Axios and ABC note that some MAGA commentators attempted to justify Trump’s attack, but reporting highlights the unusual public rebukes from conservative figures [1] [6].
4. Media framing and the charge of “Trump Derangement Syndrome”
News outlets framed Trump’s language — “Trump Derangement Syndrome” — as a long‑used disparaging term by his supporters to label critics as irrational; Forbes and The Guardian reported Trump doubled down on that framing and repeated allegations that Reiner had advanced “hoaxes” about Trump [7] [8] [9]. Coverage focuses on how invoking a mental‑illness trope in the immediate wake of violent deaths intensified outrage [7] [3].
5. Counterarguments and supporters’ defense
Some pro‑Trump voices defended or tried to contextualize the president’s comments, arguing Reiner had been an outspoken and obsessive critic and that commentary about public figures is common political rhetoric; Axios and Crooks & Liars both document pro‑Trump social‑media reactions that contrasted this incident with other public responses to political violence [1] [10]. Available sources do not present a detailed legal or evidentiary basis offered by Trump tying Reiner’s politics to the killings [1] [3].
6. Why this matters — rhetoric, responsibility, and precedent
News organizations stress the significance of a sitting president attributing a violent death to political opposition without evidence, noting the potential to inflame partisan tensions and to erode norms about responding to tragedies; outlets like The Washington Post and The New York Times highlight the unusual nature of the backlash and the ethical questions raised by such messaging [5] [3]. Reporting underscores that public leaders’ immediate framing shapes discourse even when investigators have not established motive [3] [2].
Limitations and final note
This summary relies solely on the provided reporting; available sources do not mention any law‑enforced finding that politics motivated the killings nor any forensic or motive evidence supporting Trump’s claim [2] [3]. The facts documented above — the content of Trump’s post, the arrest of the Reiners’ son, and the bipartisan criticism — are present across the cited coverage [1] [2] [3].