How reliable are vote-by-mail ballots with genuine certified citizen voters?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Vote-by-mail (VBM) ballots cast by genuine, certified citizen voters are highly reliable in the United States: administrators report widespread use of paper or auditable records, multilayer verification processes (including signature checks in many states), and post-election canvasses that count valid mail ballots into certified results, while empirical reviews find fraud in mail ballots is vanishingly rare relative to volumes cast (EAC; Brennan Center; Brookings) [1] [2] [3].
1. How reliability is measured: paper trails, verification, and counting
Reliability in VBM is driven less by the physical mail and more by the controls that validate voter identity and ensure every valid ballot is included in the canvass: over 98% of jurisdictions used voting equipment that produces a paper ballot or auditable record in 2024, and nearly 93% of states require testing and certification of voting systems (EAC) [1]; meanwhile, 31 states conduct signature comparison on returned absentee or mail ballots as a front-line verification step (Wikipedia; Brennan Center) [4] [2].
2. Ballot processing and the postal system: delivery performance and scale
The Postal Service reports processing over 99 million ballots during the 2024 general election and says ballots sent from voters to election officials were delivered on average within one day during the core election period, underscoring logistical reliability for transmission of VBM ballots (USPS) [5]. Election offices additionally accept drop boxes and in-person return options in many states, reducing sole dependence on mail transit (USA.gov) [6].
3. Rejection, cure, and inclusion: safeguards and potential failure points
States employ multiple layers—signature comparison, bipartisan adjudication teams, voter notification and cure procedures, and post-election canvasses—to avoid improperly rejecting valid ballots and to exclude invalid ones; for example, if a signature is disputed many jurisdictions route the ballot for second review or contact the voter to cure the issue (Brennan Center) [2]. Rejection commonly stems from signature mismatches or late arrival, but most jurisdictions have procedures to catch and remedy those problems before certification (Wikipedia; Bipartisan Policy) [4] [7].
4. Fraud risk and empirical track record
Multiple analyses conclude the incidence of mail-ballot fraud is extremely small relative to volume: careful studies covering prior elections document minute rates of confirmed mail-voting fraud and find none affecting the 2024 result in databases analyzed by researchers (Brookings; Bipartisan Policy) [3] [7]. The Brennan Center and others stress that structural checks make widescale manipulation of mail ballots difficult, while isolated criminal cases do not amount to systemic risk [2] [3].
5. Political dynamics and perceptions of reliability
Despite technical safeguards and reassuring audits, public confidence in VBM is politically polarized: some national leaders and activists have highlighted hypothetical vulnerabilities and pressed for faster tabulation or limits on post‑Election Day counting, while party operatives in 2024 simultaneously invested heavily in mobilizing mail-ballot use for turnout advantages—illustrating that reliability debates are entangled with partisan strategy and messaging (The Hill; Politico) [8] [9]. Analyses also show partisan differences in who chooses mail ballots across states, which fuels contested narratives even when administrative processes are robust (MIT Election Lab) [10].
6. Bottom line: reliability for genuine certified citizen voters
For ballots cast by bona fide, certified citizens, the convergence of paper auditable records, signature and ID checks in many states, bipartisan review procedures, and post-election canvasses makes vote-by-mail highly reliable in practice; logistical systems like USPS processed tens of millions of ballots quickly in 2024 and researchers find fraud rates that are vanishingly small compared with the scale of VBM use (EAC; USPS; Brookings; Brennan Center) [1] [5] [3] [2]. That said, reliability is not uniform everywhere: state-by-state rules, resource constraints at local election offices, and partisan pressure on rules and procedures mean administrators must continually enforce checks, improve outreach for cures, and invest in audits to preserve both the practical integrity of mail ballots and public confidence (MIT Election Lab; Bipartisan Policy) [11] [7].