Which major retailers publicly opposed Donald Trump during his campaigns and presidency?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Major retailers publicly distanced themselves from Trump-related products early in his first term and afterward: Nordstrom, Neiman Marcus, Sears/Kmart, Wayfair and other merchants removed Trump-branded or Ivanka Trump lines in 2017 amid consumer backlash [1]. Activist campaigns such as #GrabYourWallet catalogued many retailers that sold — or stopped selling — Trump-family products and urged boycotts; the campaign’s lists have been widely circulated and cited by outlets tracking corporate pullbacks [2] [3]. Available sources do not provide a single, authoritative roster of “all” major retailers that publicly opposed Trump during his campaigns and presidency; reporting instead documents a mix of product removals, lawsuits and corporate pushback by individual firms [4] [5].
1. Early corporate distancing: retailers that dropped Trump or Ivanka lines
Within weeks of the 2016 election and in 2017 some prominent retailers stopped carrying Trump-family merchandise. Nordstrom and Neiman Marcus were among the upscale retailers that removed Ivanka Trump’s brand after customer pressure; Sears and Kmart ended online sales of dozens of Trump Home items [1]. Trade press and outlets cataloged an expanding list of sellers that quietly or publicly ceased selling Trump-branded goods, framing these moves as reputational risk management rather than explicit political endorsements [4] [1].
2. Grassroots pressure and the #GrabYourWallet campaign
The consumer boycott movement #GrabYourWallet organized and publicized which retailers carried Trump-family products and which did not, producing lists of "boycott" and "safe" shopping zones that activists and reporters used to track corporate responses [2] [3]. The campaign’s aim was to “hit him in his wallet” and to encourage retailers to drop Trump products; it influenced some retail decisions but was one of several forces—sales performance, inventory choices and PR calculations—cited by companies when they removed lines [2] [4].
3. Businesses that publicly opposed Trump policies (beyond product decisions)
Some major companies moved beyond product choices into policy pushback. Mashable and other outlets catalogued firms that took legal or political stands against Trump administration actions—examples include Patagonia suing over public-land decisions—and businesses like Microsoft and others publicly challenged or prepared to litigate government actions tied to the administration [5] [6]. These actions represent corporate policy opposition rather than retail-product boycotts [5] [6].
4. Corporate caution during later Trump terms: quieter responses
Reporting from 2025–2025 shows many big corporations adopted a cautious posture toward public criticism of Trump’s second term, prioritizing access and regulatory outcomes over vocal opposition. Commentators and analysts observed that while some CEOs privately criticized policies, most companies avoided sustained public confrontation with the administration [7] [8]. This marks a shift from earlier, more visible consumer-focused protests to a risk-averse corporate strategy in the face of political pressure [7].
5. Retailers vs. policy: two different kinds of “opposition”
It is important to separate two phenomena documented in the sources: (A) retailers removing Trump-family products under consumer pressure or for business reasons (Nordstrom, Neiman Marcus, Sears/Kmart, Wayfair and others) [1] [4]; and (B) large corporations challenging or resisting specific Trump administration policies (e.g., Patagonia’s lawsuits, Microsoft’s legal posture around data/privacy) [5] [6]. Conflating product delisting with political opposition over policy yields misleading conclusions [1] [6].
6. What reporting does not say (limits of available sources)
Available sources do not offer a definitive, exhaustive list of “major retailers” that officially and politically opposed Donald Trump across campaigns and presidencies; instead they provide episodic examples—product removals, activist lists and a handful of high-profile corporate legal or policy challenges [1] [2] [5]. For comprehensive, current inventories of corporate political stances or campaign donations, readers must consult campaign finance databases and contemporaneous company statements; those comprehensive datasets are not supplied in the documents provided here [9].
7. Bottom line for readers
If your question is which retailers publicly opposed Trump by removing his family’s products: reporting names Nordstrom, Neiman Marcus, Sears/Kmart and several online retailers among the early examples [1] [4]. If you mean which major companies publicly opposed Trump’s policies or legal moves, reporting highlights firms such as Patagonia and Microsoft that sued or signaled legal resistance—but big corporate opposition was uneven and later muted as firms weighed regulatory and market risks [5] [6] [7].