Has richard saulsbury publicly accused donald trump of sexual assault or forced fellatio?

1. What the supplied reporting actually documents about accusations against Trump

The reporting given to review chronicles multiple women who have publicly accused Donald Trump over decades of conduct ranging from groping and unwanted kissing to rape, and it documents civil findings in at least one high‑profile case (E. Jean Carroll) in which a jury and appeals court upheld a finding of sexual abuse and awarded damages ^{[1] [4] [5]}. Major outlets compiled timelines and lists—The Guardian, Business Insider, ABC News, The Independent and others—detailing dozens of women and incidents that occurred from the 1970s through the 2010s, and those sources are the basis for the supplied reporting ^{[2] [3] [6] [7]}.

2. The supplied reporting makes no mention of Richard Saulsbury

Across the set of documents and articles provided for analysis—encyclopedic summaries, timelines, litigation dockets and news stories—none of the cited snippets or titles reference a Richard Saulsbury as an accuser of Donald Trump, nor do they report an allegation of forced fellatio attributed to that name ^{[1] [2] [4]}. Therefore, based on the provided material, there is no record to support the specific claim that Richard Saulsbury publicly accused Trump of sexual assault or forced oral sex ^{[1] [2]}.

3. How authoritative sources in the packet treat allegations and names they do report

The supplied sources name specific accusers (for example, E. Jean Carroll, Jessica Drake, Summer Zervos and others) and, in some instances, document lawsuits, verdicts and appeals—demonstrating that the reporting focuses on individuals with public statements and legal filings tied to their allegations ^{[5] [4] [8]}. Where allegations have advanced to civil trials or public lawsuits, those events are documented in the packet; conversely, an absence of a name in these records is a reasonable signal the name was not part of the public record assembled here ^{[4] [5] [2]}.

4. Limits of this analysis and alternative possibilities

This conclusion is limited to the supplied reporting and does not preclude the existence of statements outside these documents—there may be other reporting, social‑media posts, local outlets, anonymous claims, or misidentified names not included in the materials provided ^{[1] [2]}. It is also possible the name “Richard Saulsbury” is a misremembering, a private individual whose statements did not make these news compilations, or that reporting about him exists elsewhere; none of those possibilities are addressed in the supplied sources ^{[1] [2]}.

5. Why names and verification matter in sexual‑assault reporting

Public lists and timelines in mainstream coverage typically rely on named, on‑the‑record accusations, legal filings, or published memoirs to verify claims, and these sources underscore that the identity of an accuser and corroborating evidence determine whether a claim enters the public chronicle assembled by major outlets ^{[2] [5] [6]}. That standard explains why the supplied packet robustly catalogs a set of named accusers and related legal outcomes while omitting names that do not appear in verifiable public records ^{[2] [5]}.

6. Final assessment

Based solely on the supplied reporting, there is no documentation that Richard Saulsbury has publicly accused Donald Trump of sexual assault or of forcing fellatio; the materials instead enumerate other accusers, lawsuits and at least one civil judgment related to E. Jean Carroll, but they contain no reference to Saulsbury ^{[1] [4] [5]}. To determine whether such an accusation exists outside these sources would require searching additional archives, social media, court dockets or news outlets beyond the provided packet ^{[1] [2]}.