Right or left more political violence

1. Summary of the results

The analyses provided present a complex picture of the comparison between right-wing and left-wing political violence. Most sources agree that right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and deadly than left-wing violence ^[1]. For instance, one source states that right-wing attacks account for approximately 75% to 80% of U.S. domestic terrorism deaths since 2001 ^[1]. Another source supports this claim, citing data that shows right-wing attacks account for the vast majority of fatalities from domestic terrorism ^[1]. However, some sources also highlight the subjective nature of assessing political violence and the rarity of such incidents in the United States ^[2]. According to one source, only 0.35 percent of all murders since 1975 were committed in terrorist attacks, with right-wing terrorists accounting for 11 percent of those murders and left-wing terrorists accounting for about 2 percent ^[2]. Additionally, public opinion on the matter is divided, with liberals and conservatives having opposite views on whether left-wing or right-wing violence is a bigger problem ^[3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key missing context in the original statement is the definition of political violence and how it is measured. Different sources may have different criteria for what constitutes political violence, which could impact the comparison between right-wing and left-wing violence ^[4]. Another missing context is the historical context of political violence in the United States, which could provide insight into whether there are any trends or patterns in the frequency and deadliness of such incidents ^[2]. Alternative viewpoints, such as the role of ideology in motivating political violence, are also not fully explored in the original statement ^[5]. Furthermore, the impact of social and economic factors on political violence is not considered, which could be an important factor in understanding the underlying causes of such incidents ^[1].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement "right or left more political violence" is overly simplistic and does not account for the complexity of the issue. By framing the question as a binary choice between right-wing and left-wing violence, the statement ignores the nuances of political violence and the various factors that contribute to it ^[4]. Additionally, the statement may be influenced by biases and assumptions about the relative frequency and deadliness of right-wing and left-wing violence, which are not supported by all of the sources ^[5]. For example, one source suggests that the killing of Charlie Kirk is not representative of broader trends in political violence, and that data available indicates that right-wing violence is more prevalent than left-wing violence ^[5]. Liberals and conservatives may benefit from framing the issue in a way that supports their respective views, with liberals emphasizing the threat of right-wing violence and conservatives highlighting the threat of left-wing violence ^[3].