The right wing conservatives are more violent than left wing liberals
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The analyses provided suggest that most domestic terrorists in the U.S. are on the right [1], and that right-wing attacks account for the vast majority of fatalities from domestic terrorism [1]. This supports the claim that right-wing conservatives are more violent than left-wing liberals. However, some sources provide polling data that shows Americans are concerned about political violence [2], but do not provide conclusive evidence to support or refute the claim. Additionally, research from the Cato Institute shows that right-wing terrorists are blamed for more than half of the murders due to political violence in the U.S. [3]. It is also noted that younger and more liberal Americans are more likely to defend feeling joy at political opponents' deaths and that political violence can sometimes be justified [2].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Some key context that is missing from the original statement is the definition of violence and how it is measured [2]. The sources also highlight the need for bipartisan cooperation to address the issue of political violence [4]. Furthermore, the analyses suggest that political violence is a complex issue that cannot be attributed to a single ideology [5] [3]. The sources also mention that public perception of political violence is an important factor to consider [2]. Governor Hochul and a bipartisan group of elected leaders meeting to discuss the problem of political violence [4] is an example of efforts to address the issue.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be misleading as it oversimplifies the complex issue of political violence [2]. The claim that right-wing conservatives are more violent than left-wing liberals may be supported by some data [1], but it is not universally accepted [5] [3]. The statement may also be biased towards a particular ideology, as it does not acknowledge the complexity of the issue [2]. The sources suggest that both sides of the political spectrum have the potential for violence [3] [2], and that bipartisan cooperation is necessary to address the issue [4]. The Cato Institute's research [3] and Governor Hochul's efforts [4] are examples of attempts to address the issue in a non-partisan manner.