How many fatalities have been attributed to right-wing extremism in the US since the 1990s?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The analyses provided suggest that right-wing extremism has been responsible for a significant number of fatalities in the US since the 1990s. According to [1], right-wing extremist violence has been responsible for approximately 75% to 80% of U.S. domestic terrorism deaths since 2001 [1]. Additionally, [2] reports that right-wing terrorists have been responsible for 391 murders, which is approximately 11% of the total number of murders in the US from 1975 to 2025 [2]. Furthermore, [3] states that from 2017 to 2022, right-wing terror attacks in the US killed 58 people, with the majority of these deaths resulting from white supremacist attacks [3]. Similar findings are reported in [2], [1], and [3], which provide additional evidence for the claim [2] [1] [3]. Moreover, [1] and [4] provide further support for the claim, with [1] reporting that right-wing extremist violence has been responsible for approximately 75% to 80% of U.S. domestic terrorism deaths since 2001 [1], and [4] providing detailed information on extremist-related murders in 2024, including 13 deaths, all of which were connected to right-wing extremism [4].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Some analyses provide more specific data on fatalities attributed to right-wing extremism for certain time periods, such as [3], which reports on fatalities from 2017 to 2022 [3], and [4], which provides information on extremist-related murders in 2024 [4]. However, the original statement asks for the number of fatalities since the 1990s, and some analyses do not directly address this time frame, such as [2], which reports on murders from 1975 to 2025 [2]. Additionally, [5] suggests that the killing of Charlie Kirk is part of a pattern of political violence, which may be related to the claim, but does not provide a specific number of fatalities [5]. Alternative viewpoints may include the perspective that right-wing extremist violence is not the only contributor to fatalities in the US, and that other forms of extremism, such as left-wing extremism, may also be responsible for a significant number of deaths. For example, [5] implies that "radical-left" violence may be on the rise in America [5]. Key points to consider include:
- The time frame of the analysis, with some sources providing data for specific periods, such as [3], which reports on fatalities from 2017 to 2022 [3]
- The definition of right-wing extremism, with some sources providing more specific information on the types of groups or ideologies responsible for the fatalities, such as [3], which reports on white supremacist attacks [3]
- The comparison to other forms of extremism, with some sources suggesting that right-wing extremism is more deadly than left-wing extremism, such as [1], which reports that right-wing extremist violence has been responsible for approximately 75% to 80% of U.S. domestic terrorism deaths since 2001 [1]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be biased towards emphasizing the role of right-wing extremism in fatalities in the US, without providing a complete picture of the scope of extremist violence. Some analyses, such as [1] and [1], may benefit from emphasizing the significance of right-wing extremism, as they report that it has been responsible for approximately 75% to 80% of U.S. domestic terrorism deaths since 2001 [1]. On the other hand, analyses such as [5] may benefit from downplaying the role of right-wing extremism, as they suggest that other forms of extremism, such as left-wing extremism, may also be responsible for a significant number of deaths [5]. Key beneficiaries of the statement include:
- Organizations that focus on combating right-wing extremism, which may benefit from the emphasis on the significance of this form of extremism [1]
- Researchers who study the impact of right-wing extremism on society, which may benefit from the attention to this topic [1]
- However, the statement may also have negative consequences, such as:
- Oversimplifying the complex issue of extremist violence, which may lead to a lack of understanding of the root causes of the problem (p3_s2