Which right-wing extremist groups have been linked to violent attacks in the US since 2020?

1. Summary of the results

The analyses provided suggest that right-wing extremist groups have been linked to violent attacks in the US since 2020 ^[1]. According to the data, right-wing attacks account for the vast majority of fatalities from domestic terrorism, with examples such as the 2015 Charleston church shooting and the 2018 Tree of Life synagogue attack ^[1]. The sources also indicate that right-wing ideologies have fueled more than 70% of all extremist attacks and domestic terrorism plots in the United States since 2002 ^[2]. Additionally, the analyses highlight that domestic violent extremists, including those motivated by anti-government or white supremacist ideologies, pose a significant threat to the U.S. ^[3]. The data shows that right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and more deadly than left-wing violence ^[1].

• Key points from the analyses include:
• Right-wing extremist groups are linked to violent attacks in the US ^[1]
• Right-wing attacks account for the vast majority of fatalities from domestic terrorism ^[1]
• Right-wing ideologies have fueled more than 70% of all extremist attacks and domestic terrorism plots in the United States since 2002 ^[2]
• Domestic violent extremists, including those motivated by anti-government or white supremacist ideologies, pose a significant threat to the U.S. ^[3]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

While the analyses provide significant evidence of the link between right-wing extremist groups and violent attacks in the US, some sources note that assessing political violence is inherently subjective ^[4]. Additionally, the complexity and polarization of the current political landscape ^[5] may contribute to the perception of political violence. Alternative viewpoints suggest that the threat of political violence is not limited to right-wing extremist groups, but also includes left-wing groups and individuals inspired by the Islamic State and al-Qaeda ^[6]. However, the data shows that right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and more deadly ^[1].

• Missing context includes:
• The subjective nature of assessing political violence ^[4]
• The complexity and polarization of the current political landscape ^[5]
• Alternative viewpoints include:
• The threat of political violence from left-wing groups and individuals inspired by the Islamic State and al-Qaeda ^[6]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be perceived as biased towards highlighting the threat of right-wing extremist groups, while downplaying the threat from other ideologies ^[2]. Some sources suggest that the Trump administration's threats to target left-wing groups and individuals may be an attempt to silence critics and stifle political dissent ^[2]. However, the data shows that right-wing extremist violence is a significant threat ^[1], and it is crucial to acknowledge and address this threat. The sources that provide data and analysis on the threat of right-wing extremist groups, such as the Anti-Defamation League, may be seen as more credible ^[2].

• Potential misinformation/bias includes:
• The perception of bias towards highlighting the threat of right-wing extremist groups ^[2]
• The downplaying of the threat from other ideologies ^[2]
• Credible sources include:
• The Anti-Defamation League ^[2]
• Sources that provide data and analysis on the threat of right-wing extremist groups ^[1]