What public statements did Rob Reiner make after the 2024 assassination attempt on Donald Trump?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Rob Reiner did not issue any verifiable public statement endorsing or celebrating the July 2024 assassination attempt on Donald Trump; multiple fact‑checks found no evidence he said things attributed to him online and several outlets note he has publicly condemned political violence more broadly [1] [2] [3]. Claims that Reiner said things like “Too bad he turned his head” or that he wished the shooter “hadn’t missed” circulated widely on social media but were debunked by Snopes and contradicted by contemporary reporting [1] [2].
1. What contemporaneous reporting shows — no direct quote about the Butler shooting
Contemporary news coverage and later reviews of Reiner’s public record show no verifiable statement from him about the July 2024 attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania; Creators Syndicate’s review and multiple fact‑checks conclude Reiner made no public comment specific to that incident [4] [1]. Snopes’ investigations into widely shared social‑media posts found no primary source to substantiate the viral attributions and therefore labeled those claims unfounded [1] [2].
2. What Reiner did say publicly about political violence and forgiveness
While there’s no verified comment from Reiner about the Butler shooting, reporting notes that Reiner had publicly condemned political violence in general and spoken about forgiveness in other contexts — for example, praising forgiveness shown after the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s death and saying he valued “do unto others” principles [3] [5] [6]. Those broader statements are documented and have been used by outlets to contrast Reiner’s recorded rhetoric with the inflammatory quotes later ascribed to him [5] [6].
3. The viral attributions and why they spread — fact‑checks and digital weaponization
After Reiner’s death in December 2025, multiple identical images and quotes began circulating that retroactively attributed malicious remarks about the 2024 attempt to him; Snopes explicitly traced those claims and found no evidence they originated in July 2024, flagging the posts as unfounded [1] [2]. Reporting in outlets such as The New York Times, PBS and Time documents how heated political contexts and partisan actors can amplify unverified claims — a dynamic visible in how these attributions resurfaced after Reiner’s death and were used to inflame partisan debate [7] [8] [9].
4. Alternative narratives and partisan responses
Some conservative commentators and opinion writers have asserted Reiner either made extreme remarks or should have been held responsible for partisan hostility, while other outlets and fact‑checkers push back, emphasizing the lack of evidence for the most inflammatory quotes and pointing to Reiner’s record of condemning violence [9] [2] [3]. The divergence in coverage reflects implicit agendas: actors seeking to capitalize on Reiner’s death to score political points amplified unverified claims, whereas neutral fact‑checking outlets prioritized sourcing and context [1] [2].
5. What cannot be concluded from the provided reporting
The assembled reporting is clear that no verified, contemporaneous Reiner quote endorsing the Butler attack exists in the public record and that many viral attributions are unfounded, but the sources do not — and the fact‑checkers caution they cannot — prove the nonexistence of every private remark or off‑the‑record conversation; the specific absence of a verified public statement is what the documentation supports [1] [4]. Readers should note that the posthumous spread of false quotations highlights how quickly unverified material can become accepted as fact absent careful sourcing [1] [7].