Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What role has the Catholic vote played in past presidential elections, including the 2020 election with Donald Trump?
Executive summary
The Catholic electorate has been a pivotal, often split, swing bloc in recent U.S. presidential contests — large enough (about one-quarter of the electorate) to matter in close states — and in 2020 Catholics divided almost evenly between Joe Biden and Donald Trump, with exit and post-election polls showing results ranging from Biden +4 among Catholics (51%–47%) to an essentially even split (50% Trump vs. 49% Biden) depending on the poll [1] [2] [3]. Voting within Catholicism is sharply divided by race and religiosity: white Catholics trended Republican and Hispanic/Latinx Catholics leaned Democratic, making geographic concentrations of Catholics (especially in the Midwest) strategically important [4] [5] [6].
1. The Catholic vote: a large, heterogeneous constituency that swings elections
Catholics make up roughly one-fifth to one-quarter of the electorate and are concentrated in battlegrounds — states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Florida and Ohio — so shifts in Catholic support can alter Electoral College outcomes; political analysts and exit-poll breakdowns emphasize that Catholics are a key swing group rather than a monolithic bloc [6] [4] [3].
2. How Catholics voted in 2020: contested measures, multiple polls
Reporting after the 2020 election shows different measures. Some exit-poll analyses put Biden ahead among all Catholics by about 51% to 47% (one Washington Post exit-poll summary cited by the National Catholic Register and academic summaries), while AP VoteCast and Edison-style measures found near parity — AP VoteCast reported 50% for Trump and 49% for Biden [2] [3] [4] [1]. The differing methodologies produced slightly different national Catholic tallies, but all agree Catholics were closely split [3] [4].
3. The internal divides that explain why the Catholic vote isn’t uniform
Catholic voting varied dramatically by race, ethnicity and practice. White Catholics tended to favor Trump more strongly (reports cite majorities for Trump among white Catholics in some surveys), while Latinx/Hispanic Catholics leaned substantially toward Biden — Catholics of different religiosity levels also split, with practicing Catholics often more conservative on certain issues [4] [5] [2]. Analysts note that this intra-faith heterogeneity neutralizes any single “Catholic” cue from clergy or Rome [4] [7].
4. Issues that campaigns used to court Catholics — and why they mattered unevenly
Both campaigns targeted Catholics: Republicans emphasized abortion and judicial appointments; Democrats highlighted immigration, social justice, and concerns about rhetoric and governance. Analysts and Catholic advocacy groups framed 2020 as a contest in which abortion did not uniformly drive Catholics to Republicans and issues like immigration and tone appealed to other Catholic constituencies; different Catholic subgroups responded to different appeals [3] [5] [4].
5. The Catholic vote’s outsized role in key states
Scholars and commentators stress that Catholic concentrations in the Great Lakes and Rust Belt matter more than the national percentage: Catholic shifts in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin are repeatedly cited as decisive in tight contests, so relatively small swings among Catholics in those states can flip Electoral College results [6] [7]. One analysis argues white Catholic support helped Trump carry those states in 2016 and made Catholic campaigning central in 2020 [7] [6].
6. Competing narratives about who “won” the Catholic vote in 2020
Different outlets and advocacy groups draw different conclusions: Catholics for Choice and some analysts emphasize that Biden’s margins among Latinx Catholics and independents helped him nationally [5], while conservative commentators and some polls note that Trump carried a plurality or slight majority of Catholics in other measures [3] [8]. Both views rely on different datasets (exit polls vs. VoteCast vs. post-election surveys), so the claim that one candidate “won” Catholics depends on which poll is cited [2] [3] [4].
7. What to watch going forward and limitations of the record
Available reporting shows consistent internal divisions in the Catholic electorate and the high strategic importance of Catholics in swing states, but precise national shares vary by poll and methodology; some sources emphasize white Catholic gains for Republicans [6] [7], while others stress Latino Catholic strength for Democrats [5]. Available sources do not mention a single definitive, universally accepted exit-poll figure for Catholics in 2020 — instead they present multiple reputable estimates [2] [3] [4].
Sources cited in this piece use exit polls, AP VoteCast, academic summaries and advocacy analyses; where they disagree, this summary notes both datasets and the distinct conclusions drawn from them [2] [1] [3] [5] [4] [7] [6].