Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Is the Rothschild family and also the Roosevelts still influential? Are they a part of what’s known as the “Deep State”
1. Summary of the results
Based on the analyses provided, there is limited evidence to support claims about current influence of either family or their involvement in a "Deep State."
Regarding the Rothschild family:
- The family has a documented historical legacy in international banking and finance that continues today [1] [2]
- Sources confirm their ongoing involvement in global finance and note their adaptability over time, which could indicate continued influence [2]
- However, no sources directly address their current level of influence or any connection to a "Deep State" [1] [3] [2]
Regarding the Roosevelt family:
- The analyses focus primarily on Franklin D. Roosevelt's historical legacy and impact on American politics and society [4] [5] [6]
- Sources highlight the family's significant role in shaping American history but provide no information about their current influence [4] [5] [6]
- No evidence was found linking the Roosevelt family to any "Deep State" activities [4] [5] [6]
Regarding the "Deep State" concept:
- The term is primarily discussed as a conspiracy theory popularized by Donald Trump and his allies [7] [8]
- Sources treat it as a political concept rather than a verified organizational structure [7] [9]
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The analyses reveal several critical gaps in addressing the original question:
- Current financial influence: While the Rothschild family's historical banking prominence is established [1] [2], the analyses lack specific data on their current market share, assets, or decision-making power in today's financial landscape
- Antisemitic conspiracy theories: One source specifically addresses how Rothschild-related conspiracy theories often contain antisemitic elements [3], but this important context about the harmful nature of some claims about the family is not fully explored
- Roosevelt family's current status: The analyses provide extensive historical context about Franklin D. Roosevelt's presidency [4] [5] [6] but offer no information about living Roosevelt family members or their current roles in politics, business, or society
- Alternative definitions of influence: The sources don't explore legitimate forms of ongoing influence these families might have through:
- Charitable foundations and philanthropy
- Business networks and investments
- Political connections and lobbying
- Cultural and social influence
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question contains several problematic assumptions:
- Conflation of historical and current influence: The question assumes both families maintain the same level of influence they may have had historically, without acknowledging that family influence typically diminishes over generations through wealth dispersion and changing economic structures
- "Deep State" framing: By asking about involvement in the "Deep State," the question adopts conspiracy theory terminology that sources indicate is primarily used as a political tool rather than describing a verified organizational structure [7] [10]
- Lack of specificity: The question doesn't define what type of "influence" is being discussed - whether economic, political, cultural, or conspiratorial - making it difficult to provide a factual assessment
- Potential antisemitic undertones: Given that one source specifically addresses antisemitic conspiracy theories surrounding the Rothschild family [3], questions about their secretive influence may inadvertently perpetuate harmful stereotypes about Jewish families in finance
The question would benefit from more specific, evidence-based framing that distinguishes between legitimate business influence and unsubstantiated conspiracy theories.