Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: What is the controversy regarding Russia still owning alaska

Checked on August 17, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The analyses clearly establish that Russia does not currently own Alaska. The territory was officially sold by Russia to the United States in 1867 for $7.2 million through a legitimate treaty [1] [2] [3]. This historical transaction is well-documented, with sources providing comprehensive accounts of the events leading up to the sale, the treaty signing, and the formal transfer of ownership from Russia to the United States [3].

The "controversy" appears to stem not from any legitimate ownership dispute, but rather from what sources describe as the "Alaska myth" prevalent in some Russian circles [4]. This myth involves beliefs among some Russians that Alaska is rightfully theirs and was somehow improperly taken by the US [4]. However, these are characterized as conspiracy theories rather than supported historical claims [5].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks important historical context about why this "controversy" exists. The analyses reveal several key missing elements:

  • The Alaska Purchase was a strategic decision by Russia due to their keen interest in the region's natural resources, but ultimately they chose to sell rather than maintain the distant territory [2]
  • Geographic connections still exist between Russia and Alaska through the Diomede Islands, where one can literally walk from the US to Russia, maintaining a physical link that may fuel romantic notions about the connection [6]
  • The persistence of conspiracy theories in Russia suggests that some Russians question whether Alaska is truly American, despite the clear historical record [7] [5]
  • Modern geopolitical significance continues, as evidenced by discussions of Trump-Putin summits in Alaska highlighting the "historical significance" of Russian-American relations in the region [8]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains a fundamental factual error by suggesting there is a legitimate controversy about Russia "still owning" Alaska. The analyses demonstrate that:

  • No credible ownership dispute exists - Russia legally and completely transferred Alaska to the United States in 1867 [1] [3]
  • The framing implies ongoing legitimacy to Russian claims when sources clearly identify these as myths and conspiracy theories rather than valid legal or historical arguments [4] [5]
  • The question may inadvertently amplify disinformation by treating unfounded conspiracy theories as if they constitute a genuine "controversy" worthy of debate, when the historical record is unambiguous about Alaska's legal status as US territory

The question appears to conflate nostalgic sentiment and conspiracy theories with actual legal or political disputes, potentially giving unwarranted credibility to claims that lack historical foundation.

Want to dive deeper?
What are the terms of the Alaska Purchase Treaty of 1867?
Did Russia ever officially relinquish claims to Alaska?
What are the current US-Russia border disputes in the Arctic?
How does the Treaty of Cession of 1867 affect modern-day Alaska?
Are there any ongoing Russian territorial claims in North America?