Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Not one ukrainian politician was killed by russia, not one government building in Kyiv was bombed by russia. I guess Putin is way too soft on them. He should flatten them out

Checked on December 18, 2024

1. Summary of the results

1. Summary of the results

The statement is demonstrably false. Multiple Ukrainian politicians have been killed during the conflict, including Illia Kyva (former Ukrainian lawmaker) and Oleg Popov (Russian-backed politician in Luhansk). Government buildings in Kyiv have been targeted, with documented missile strikes causing significant damage to buildings and civilian casualties.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

  • The conflict has resulted in 39,081 verified civilian casualties as of October 2024, with 12,162 civilian deaths since February 2022
  • Both sides have engaged in targeted killings, with Ukraine successfully executing operations against figures like Darya Dugina (2022), Vladlen Tatarsky (2023), and Lt. Gen. Igor Kirillov in Moscow
  • The war has evolved into a complex conflict involving both conventional warfare and targeted assassinations
  • The highest civilian death toll was recorded in March 2022 with over 3,900 deaths
  • Kyiv has faced repeated missile strikes, with the United Nations Human Rights Office documenting multiple attacks on civilian infrastructure

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

  • The statement appears to be deliberately promoting a pro-Russian narrative that minimizes the intensity and impact of Russian military actions
  • It falsely suggests Russian military restraint, when evidence shows significant aggressive actions
  • The statement's call for more aggressive action ("flatten them out") ignores the already substantial civilian casualties and infrastructure damage
  • This type of narrative typically benefits Russian state media and pro-war advocates who seek to portray Russian military actions as limited or restrained, when evidence shows otherwise
  • The statement omits crucial context about civilian casualties and infrastructure damage that has been independently verified by international organizations like the UN
Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?