Does Sadiq Kahn want to get rid of the word Christmad
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Claims that London mayor Sadiq Khan is trying to “get rid of the word ‘Christmas’” or that he dislikes Christmas circulate widely on social media and fringe sites after this year’s festive events; the supplied reporting shows viral clips and commentary mocking his apparent discomfort at a carol performance and criticizing decorations, but those sources are from tabloids and known misinformation sites and do not document an official policy to remove the word “Christmas” [1] [2] [3]. Available sources do not mention any official statement or policy by Khan to remove the word “Christmas” from public signage or programming (not found in current reporting).
1. Viral footage and hostile commentary — what the sources show
Multiple outlets and social posts focus on a brief public moment in which Khan appears uneasy while joining carols at a Trafalgar Square/Christmas lights event; that clip was replayed alongside outraged commentary suggesting he “panicked” when the lyrics referenced Christ [3] [4]. The spread includes fringe and partisan websites republishing the same video with inflammatory headlines — for example, Pravda-type sites and US partisan blogs ran versions portraying Khan as hostile to Christmas [2] [5] [6].
2. Conservative and tabloid framing — “War on Christmas” narratives
Conservative commentators and outlets framed the moment as evidence of a broader “war on Christmas,” pairing the clip with critiques of London festive displays that supposedly omit the word “Christmas.” PJ Media and Express-style pieces amplified outrage, arguing Khan’s actions or the lighting displays show a deliberate avoidance of Christian language or symbolism [1] [7].
3. Decoration and event criticism — complaints, not policy
Some reporting centers on public dissatisfaction with the look or wording of holiday displays (for example, Oxford Street lights and Trafalgar Square tree reactions), and social-media users blamed Khan personally for perceived blandness or for not explicitly saying “Christmas” in promotional copy [1] [8]. These are reactions and opinion; the supplied sources do not quote an official policy or mayoral directive removing the word “Christmas” (not found in current reporting).
4. Source reliability and echo chamber dynamics
Most of the pieces in the file are tabloids, partisan blogs or sites known for sensational or conspiratorial angles (Pravda, TrendingPoliticsNews, USSA News, NotTheBee). These sources recycle the same viral clip and often add editorialized captions about Khan’s faith or intent, rather than reporting new factual evidence of a policy change [2] [3] [4]. The Express article is a mainstream tabloid-style outlet that reported criticism of the lights but did not provide evidence of an official effort to excise “Christmas” from public life [1].
5. What supporters and critics emphasize
Critics use Khan’s religion and the moment’s awkwardness to argue he is out of step with Christian traditions; that line appears explicitly in social commentary cited in Al Bawaba and other outlets blaming Khan’s Muslim faith for choices around displays [8]. Pro-Khan views or official spokespeople are not present in these sources defending any policy or explaining the broader planning decisions; available sources do not show his office issuing a statement defending or explaining wording choices beyond general event promotion (not found in current reporting).
6. What the evidence does not show
There is no documentation among the supplied items of any formal plan, mayoral order, or council policy to “get rid of the word ‘Christmas’.” The corpus shows viral mockery, critical op-eds and reposted video snippets, but not an announced attempt to remove the term from public events or signage (not found in current reporting). Any definitive claim that Khan “wants to get rid of the word ‘Christmas’” is unsupported by the provided material.
7. Hidden agendas and why this story spreads
The narrative is politically useful for outlets and social accounts that frame multiculturalism as erasing Christian heritage; several sources explicitly conflate Khan’s Muslim faith with hostile intent toward Christmas, which serves a partisan grievance storyline [7] [8]. The repetition of one short clip across many low-credibility sites demonstrates how a single moment can be weaponized into a broader culture-war claim without evidentiary backing [2] [4].
Conclusion: The supplied reporting documents viral footage of an awkward carol moment and subsequent criticism of London’s festive decorations, not a policy or explicit political campaign to eliminate the word “Christmas.” Readers should treat sensational headlines in the provided sources as opinion or amplification of social-media outrage rather than proof of a deliberate official effort by the mayor [1] [2] [3].