How did Bernie Sanders and Angus King caucusing with Democrats influence control in 2017 and 2021?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Bernie Sanders and Angus King have both caucused with Senate Democrats for years, giving Democrats effective additional votes that affected Senate control margins in 2017 and in the 2021 50–50 configuration; King’s 2012 decision to caucus shifted the post‑2012 Senate to a 55–45 Democratic advantage (effectively) [1], and Sanders’ long‑standing caucus alignment was a key part of the Democratic side when the chamber was evenly split after the 2020 elections (available sources do not explicitly state a numeric seat total for 2021 tied to both senators) [2] [3].
1. How “caucusing” works and why it matters for control
Caucusing means an independent senator aligns with a party for organization, committee assignments and leadership votes while retaining independent formal registration; both Angus King and Bernie Sanders have done this, which lets the Democratic conference count them when organizing the Senate and divvying committee posts [4] [3]. Caucusing does not force full party membership — the Democratic National Committee discussed urging them to join in 2017, but the DNC did not bind them and both declined formal party switching [5] [6].
2. The 2017 context: King’s 2012 choice changed the arithmetic
When Angus King announced after his 2012 win that he would caucus with Senate Democrats, news outlets reported that his alignment would give Democrats an “effective” 55–45 edge in the next Senate [1]. Multiple contemporary accounts and biographies note King’s move was motivated by committee access and effectiveness — without a caucus he would have been largely excluded from committee work, a practical barrier to influence [3] [7]. That effective majority matters because committee control and floor scheduling flow from the majority party’s organizational foothold.
3. The 2021 moment: Sanders’ role in a 50–50 Senate
After the 2020 elections the Senate picture hinged on two outcomes: the two Georgia runoffs and Vice President Kamala Harris’s tiebreaking power. Bernie Sanders has long caucused with Democrats and served in Democratic leadership roles, and his presence in the caucus contributed to the Democratic side’s claim to the majority when the 50–50 split was resolved in the Democrats’ favor in January 2021 [2]. Sources show Sanders sometimes votes independently of Democratic leadership — for example, he opposed a Biden cabinet nominee in February 2021 — but his formal caucus alignment counted toward Democratic organization in that evenly divided chamber [2].
4. What the sources say — and what they don’t
Reporting and encyclopedic entries are consistent that both men caucus with Democrats and that King’s caucus decision produced an “effective” Democratic advantage after his election [4] [1]. Sources directly connecting the two senators to a specific numerical Senate majority in January 2021 are not explicit in the provided reporting; available sources do not mention a single citation that phrases the 2021 majority solely as “because Sanders and King caucused” [2] [3]. The 2017 DNC episode shows party actors wanted public affiliation but ultimately accepted the practical caucus arrangement [5] [6].
5. Competing perspectives and implicit incentives
Angus King has consistently framed caucusing as pragmatic — necessary for committee access and influence — while remaining independent for political identity reasons [3] [8]. The DNC and some party officials pushed for formal affiliation in 2017, reflecting an institutional desire to shore up party branding and ballot‑down‑ticket coordination; Democrats ultimately rebuffed a resolution that would have urged the senators to switch [5] [6]. Bernie Sanders leverages caucus membership for legislative clout while maintaining an outsider profile that fuels his base and presidential runs; that dual role creates both political leverage inside the caucus and friction with party regulars [9] [2].
6. Bottom line for control in 2017 and 2021
King’s 2012 announcement to caucus with Democrats was immediately reported as changing the post‑2012 Senate math in practical terms, producing an effective Democratic advantage [1]. Sanders’ long‑standing alignment with Senate Democrats was a material element of the Democratic conference when the Senate reached a 50–50 split in early 2021, because caucus membership determines organizational control and committee composition even when members remain formally independent [2] [3]. Sources do not attribute every legislative outcome to these two senators alone; they show caucus alignment is one decisive structural factor among many in close Senates (available sources do not mention every specific vote or majority outcome tied exclusively to their caucusing).