Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What is the estimated cost of Secret Service protection for other former US presidents?
Executive Summary
The publicly available analyses converge on one clear finding: there is no precise, public estimate of the Secret Service cost for protecting individual former U.S. presidents; major reports instead provide aggregate figures for offices, security support, and Secret Service budgets. Federal studies and reporting cite historical lump-sum totals—such as roughly $370 million spent supporting former presidents and families from 1977–2000 and multi-billion-dollar Secret Service budgets for overall protection—but the line-item cost per former president is not disclosed in the cited sources [1] [2] [3]. The legal framework guarantees lifetime protection under the Former Presidents Act, but the government’s published materials emphasize aggregate program costs and classified protection details, leaving individual protection costs opaque [4] [5].
1. Why the exact price tag is elusive — classified details and aggregate accounting
Public documents and analyses repeatedly show that protection-specific costs for individual former presidents are not published and often treated within broader, sometimes classified, budget categories. Government accountability reports have broken out historical aggregate spending—such as the federal government’s roughly $370 million to support former presidents and families from fiscal years 1977 through 2000 and $26 million in FY2000 for office and security-related costs—but these figures explicitly exclude a transparent, per-person accounting for Secret Service protection. The Secret Service’s own budget documents emphasize total appropriations for protection and operations rather than itemizing costs tied to specific former protectees, and other reports note that certain protective expenditures are operationally sensitive or classified, which further limits public disclosure [1] [6] [5].
2. What public budget snapshots do reveal — big-picture program spending
Although individual-level protection costs are not reported, the public record provides broader cost context: reporting and agency briefs indicate that presidential and family protection is part of a very large protective apparatus. Journalistic and budget summaries have reported multi-billion-dollar totals tied to presidential protection and Secret Service operations—for example, reporting that the president and first family's protection-related spending exceeded $2 billion in a reported year and that the Secret Service’s protection division accounted for a substantial portion of overall agency spending (with figures cited like $1.2 billion for the protection division within larger totals), illustrating that the agency’s mission commands significant resources even if per-former-president costs are not separated out [2].
3. Legal entitlement vs. fiscal transparency — the Former Presidents Act’s role
The legal framework is straightforward: the Former Presidents Act and subsequent provisions guarantee lifetime Secret Service protection for former presidents and certain family members, and analyses note that protection costs are a recognized and ongoing federal obligation. However, while the law defines eligibility and scope, it does not prescribe public cost-reporting at an individual level, and oversight documents and fiscal watchdog analyses have repeatedly highlighted that many provisions—pensions, office allowances, and security—are paid from different budget lines or aggregated in ways that prevent easy extraction of a single protection price per former president. This separation of legal entitlement from granular fiscal transparency is why observers can state who is protected but not at what discrete cost [4] [7].
4. Divergent estimates and what they omit — aggregate totals vs. excluded categories
Different sources point to aggregate historic costs—such as taxpayers paying nearly $68 million to support former presidents since 2000 in certain reported categories—but some of those analyses explicitly exclude Secret Service protection from their totals, underscoring inconsistent accounting practices across reports. Investigative pieces and budget summaries therefore produce numbers that are informative about overall post-presidential support but are not apples-to-apples measures of Secret Service expenditures. Where media outlets or think tanks attempt to quantify post-presidential spending, they frequently note exclusions or the absence of secret-service-specific line items, meaning that any headline figure claiming a per-former-president cost typically represents an estimate built on assumptions rather than a documented, government-published line item [3] [8] [1].
5. The bottom line for readers — what can be stated with confidence
It is certain that the federal government provides lifetime Secret Service protection to former presidents and that the Secret Service and related agencies operate on budgets totaling hundreds of millions to billions annually; it is not certain, based on the cited sources, how much of that funding is attributable to protecting any particular former president. The available analyses and GAO-style budget summaries provide aggregate historical totals and program-level budgets (for example, the 1977–2000 and FY2000 figures and modern Secret Service appropriation overviews) but consistently note the absence of published, per-individual protection costs and the operational or classification reasons that drive that opacity [1] [2] [3]. In short: the law ensures protection, the budgets show large program costs, but the precise per-former-president Secret Service price tag remains undocumented in public sources [5] [4].