What continuing resolution bills have Senate Democrats introduced to fund the government in 2025?

Executive summary — short answer up front: Senate Democrats did introduce at least one formal continuing resolution-style bill in 2025: Senator Patty Murray’s S.2882, the "Continuing Appropriations and Extensions and Other Matters Act, 2026," is recorded as a Democratic-sponsored stopgap intended to preserve funding into late FY2026 and to extend a set of health and program authorities; that bill failed a recorded Senate vote on September 30, 2025 ^[1]. Other contemporaneous news reporting from November 2025 describes ongoing Democratic debate and negotiation over alternative CRs and extensions rather than cataloging additional separate Democratic-filed CRs, and it highlights competing proposals from Republicans and bipartisan centrist groups ^{[2] [3]}. The picture is therefore: at least one formal Democratic CR was filed in the Senate in 2025 (S.2882), while news coverage through November 5, 2025 centers on negotiation over multiple CR options and amendments rather than on a long list of distinct Democratic-filed bills ^{[1] [4] [5]}.

1. How many formal Democratic continuing resolutions emerged — and what’s on the record? The legislative record cited identifies S.2882, introduced by Senator Patty Murray and described as a continuing appropriations measure that would extend FY2026 funding authorities through October 31, 2025, while also extending certain health subsidies and program authorities; the bill is recorded as failing a Senate vote 47–53 on September 30, 2025 ^[1]. Another related legislative text labeled “Continuing Appropriations and Extensions and Other Matters Act, 2026” appears in the record with similar scope and language attributing Democratic authorship and provisions preventing executive reprogramming and addressing defense and veterans funding ^[6]. These entries in the legislative feed constitute the clearest, documentable instances of Senate Democrats introducing an across-the-board stopgap in 2025 ^{[6] [1]}.

2. What do contemporaneous news reports say — negotiations, not filings? Reporting in early November 2025 documents negotiations and competing CR offers rather than listing multiple Democratic-filed CRs. News pieces describe Senate Democrats debating whether to reopen the government without concessions on health subsidies, exploring attaching full-year bills to a CR, and considering CR durations ranging from mid-December into January — but the stories do not enumerate additional separate Senate Democratic CR filings beyond the legislative entries already noted ^{[2] [3] [4]}. That coverage shows Democrats divided on strategy and suggests much of the public action involved bargaining over CR terms, add-ons, and duration rather than a parade of distinct Democratic CR bills hitting the Senate clerk simultaneously ^{[3] [7]}.

3. How do Republican and bipartisan alternatives compare to the Democratic filing? Republican leaders and House Republicans pursued their own stopgap measures and full-year proposals in 2025; one full-year appropriations act that became law — the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 — originated in the House under Rep. Tom Cole and became Public Law No. 119-4 on March 15, 2025 ^[8]. Senate Republican leadership was pushing CRs that would fund the government through December or mid-December, with some support for longer extensions into January, and GOP appropriators also explored a minibus of targeted full-year bills to attach to a CR. Those GOP proposals differed from the Democratic S.2882 in both scope (timing and program extensions) and policy riders, especially on health insurance subsidies and programmatic priorities ^{[3] [5]}.

4. What political fault lines and agendas explain differences in coverage? The sources show clear agenda lines: Senate Democrats emphasized securing health insurance subsidies and program extensions as conditions for reopening the government, reflecting policy priorities and vulnerability among vulnerable voters; Senate Republicans emphasized shorter CRs or different package combinations and pressed to complete appropriations in the Senate or attach select full-year bills ^{[4] [7]}. News reporting frames these differences as intra-party divisions among Democrats (centrists willing to negotiate vs. progressives demanding concessions) and as bargaining leverage in bipartisan talks; the legislative record shows Democrats translating some of those priorities into a formal bill (S.2882) while negotiations continued ^{[2] [3] [1]}.

5. Bottom line for the claim you asked about — presence, context, and limits: The claim that Senate Democrats introduced continuing resolution bills to fund the government in 2025 is partly confirmed: the Senate Democratic-sponsored S.2882 is a documented CR-style measure introduced in 2025 and recorded as failing on September 30, 2025 ^[1]. Reporting through early November 2025 does not identify a broader set of additional distinct Democratic-filed CRs beyond that legislative entry; instead, it documents ongoing negotiations over alternative CR lengths and attached appropriations that dominated public coverage ^{[2] [5]}. Users seeking a complete ledger should consult the Senate clerk and Congress.gov for subsequent filings or amendments beyond the September 2025 S.2882 entry ^{[6] [1]}.