Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Factcheck Senator Kennedy called out the NIH for spending millions of dollars on wasteful woke junk! $142k alone went to gender affirmative care

Checked on June 18, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The analyses reveal no direct evidence supporting the specific claim that Senator Kennedy called out the NIH for spending millions on "wasteful woke junk" or that $142k specifically went to gender affirmative care. While one source confirms Senator Kennedy did question NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, it does not mention the specific topics claimed in the statement [1].

The sources do confirm significant NIH policy changes under the Trump administration, including the defunding of transgender health research projects and a shift toward studying "regret" after gender transition [2]. Additionally, a federal judge ordered the NIH to restore grants that were cut based on gender ideology or diversity, equity, and inclusion considerations [3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original statement omits crucial context about the broader NIH funding controversy. The analyses reveal that:

  • The Trump administration has systematically redirected NIH research priorities away from sexual and gender minority health research, which has historically been underfunded [4]
  • NIH employees have signed protest letters regarding the agency's direction under current leadership [5]
  • There are ongoing legal challenges to NIH funding cuts, with courts ordering restoration of terminated grants [3]
  • The administration has proposed tying research grants to academic freedom requirements, potentially withholding funding from universities with "woke policies" [6]

Conservative politicians like Senator Kennedy benefit from framing NIH spending as wasteful "woke" expenditures, as this narrative supports their base's opposition to LGBTQ+ research and programs. Conversely, research institutions and advocacy groups benefit from maintaining federal funding for gender and sexual minority health studies.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The statement contains several problematic elements:

  • Unverified specific dollar amount: The $142k figure for gender affirmative care cannot be confirmed through any of the provided analyses
  • Inflammatory language: Terms like "wasteful woke junk" represent politically charged framing rather than factual description of research programs
  • Missing attribution: The statement fails to provide specific sources or context for the claimed interaction between Senator Kennedy and the NIH
  • Selective presentation: The statement ignores the legal and scientific community pushback against NIH funding cuts, presenting only one perspective on a complex policy debate [3] [5]

The analyses suggest this claim may be partially fabricated or significantly exaggerated, as no source directly supports the specific details presented in the original statement.

Want to dive deeper?
What is the NIH's stance on funding research for gender affirmative care?
How much has the NIH spent on gender affirmative care research in total?
What other projects has Senator John Kennedy criticized as 'woke junk'?
What are the benefits and drawbacks of gender affirmative care, according to medical research?
How does the NIH determine which research projects to fund, and what is the review process?