Which senators voted no on the October 30 2025 continuing resolution?

Executive summary — Short answer, tangled record: The congressional roll‑call materials provided show a continuing resolution (H.R. 5371) repeatedly failed to advance in October 2025, with a cloture motion rejected on October 28 by a 54–45 margin and multiple prior failed CR votes in mid‑ to late‑October; the dataset contains conflicting claims about whether a distinct “October 30” Senate vote actually occurred, and no single, uncontested roll call labeled “October 30 continuing resolution” appears in the assembled material. The most consistent finding is that 45 senators voted “no” on the relevant cloture/CR attempts in late October 2025, and those “no” votes were largely cast by Senate Democrats (with a handful of cross‑party divergences noted in the records) ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

1. What the claim is and why records matter — parsing the question like a reporter: The user asks for “which senators voted no on the October 30, 2025 continuing resolution,” implying a single, definitive roll call on that date. The assembled roll‑call summaries show a flurry of votes on H.R. 5371 and related motions through September and October 2025, including a clear cloture rejection on October 28 and repeated prior votes on the same CR language. The core factual issue is whether a separate, recorded Senate roll call occurred on October 30; one part of the packet explicitly states no continuing‑resolution vote took place on October 30 and points to October 28 as the relevant failed effort, so the question may rest on an incorrect premise (no October 30 roll call exists in these records) ^{[4] [1]}.

2. What the roll‑call data show — the pattern of late‑October votes: The roll‑call sources document multiple attempts to advance H.R. 5371 in October. The most detailed entries list a 54–45 cloture defeat on October 28 and a series of similar tallies across October (many results at 54–45 or in the mid‑50s vs mid‑40s), with the same core divide repeating across votes. Those roll calls consistently show 45 senators voting “nay” on the GOP “clean” CR on different days, and the roll calls themselves list names for the nays in some instances (a full roster for particular votes is provided in the roll‑call logs referenced) ^{[2] [1]}.

3. Who the “no” voters were — the consistent cast and a few defectors: Where the roll‑call documents enumerate names for a specific late‑October vote, the 45 “no” votes were predominantly Democratic senators, with negligible deviation across successive failed motions. Media summaries and tracking posts report that only two Democrats (John Fetterman and Catherine Cortez Masto) and Independent Angus King broke ranks in some votes to support the GOP measure, while most Democrats continued to vote “no.” That pattern implies the 45 nays on the late‑October cloture were essentially the Democratic caucus minus identified defectors, though individual roll‑call pages are necessary to enumerate every name for a given tally ^{[3] [5]}.

4. Conflicting timeline and source disagreement — where the mess comes from: The dataset contains explicit contradictions: one analysis notes no CR vote occurred on October 30 and points to October 28 as the last recorded failed attempt, while another item treats October 30 as a date on which a CR vote did occur but lacks a definitive roll‑call list for that day. These discrepancies likely stem from rapid, repeated votes and media shorthand for “late October” that collapsed different attempts into a single date; the authoritative Senate roll‑call files in the packet register the October 28 cloture vote as the contemporaneous, recorded failure ^{[4] [2]}.

5. Political context and why names matter — motives and messaging: The voting pattern reflects a strategic Democratic bloc refusal to pass a “clean” GOP continuing resolution without concessions — chiefly demands on health‑care subsidy extensions — while Republicans repeatedly pushed the same CR package. Union pressure and public statements urged passage to end a shutdown, but Democrats held firm, producing repeated 54–45 defeats of cloture. The documented defectors (Fetterman, Cortez Masto, and Angus King) underscore intra‑caucus tensions and pragmatic pressure, and Senate procedural votes magnified those divisions across successive roll calls ^{[3] [2]}.

6. Bottom line: what you can reliably report to others today: Based on the provided roll‑call materials, there is no unambiguous Senate roll call dated October 30 for a continuing resolution in these files; the pertinent, recorded late‑October defeat occurred on October 28 with a 54–45 cloture loss, and 45 senators consistently voted “no” on those late‑October CR efforts, primarily Democratic senators with named exceptions noted above. If you need a precise, enumerated list of every senator who voted “no” on the specific cloture or CR motion, consult the Senate’s official roll‑call pages for the exact vote number referenced in these summaries — the packet points to that roll‑call series but does not present a single uncontested “October 30” roll call to quote ^{[1] [4] [2]}.