Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Who is Shauna Rey and what is her connection to pipe bombs?
Executive Summary
Shauna Rey is not an established, publicly confirmed figure in federal reporting on the January 6, 2021 pipe‑bomb placements; the name that appears in investigative claims is Shauni Rae Kerkhoff, a former U.S. Capitol Police officer whom a handful of conservative or independent outlets have alleged — based largely on a private gait‑analysis — may match the pipe‑bomb suspect at a high probability (claimed 94–98%). Federal authorities, including the FBI and the Department of Justice, have not publicly identified Kerkhoff or anyone named Shauna Rey as a suspect, and major mainstream outlets have not corroborated the gait‑analysis allegation, leaving the claim unverified and contested [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Why this name keeps surfacing and what the claim actually says
The core claim circulating in some outlets names Shauni Rae Kerkhoff (sometimes rendered in circulation as Shauna Rey) as a former U.S. Capitol Police officer allegedly matched to the January 5–6 pipe‑bomb videos through a forensic gait analysis that its proponents say yields a 94–98% similarity to the suspect. The allegation was amplified by investigative pieces in certain conservative media and independent commentators who emphasize the gait‑match statistic and Kerkhoff’s prior Capitol Police role and later security work. Those pieces present the gait analysis as the linchpin of the claim, framing it as direct evidence linking Kerkhoff to the placement of pipe bombs near both party committee headquarters, but they do not point to any public FBI or DOJ criminal charging documents that name her [1] [2].
2. Official responses and the absence of federal confirmation
Federal law enforcement has not publicly confirmed Kerkhoff as a suspect; the FBI and Department of Justice have not released statements identifying Shauni Rae Kerkhoff or any “Shauna Rey” as responsible for the pipe bombs. Capitol Police officials, including then leadership, have repeatedly denied departmental involvement in the placements, and mainstream investigative reporting has not produced corroborating documentary evidence tying Kerkhoff to the devices. This gap between private investigative claims and official public confirmation is central: the allegation rests primarily on an external gait‑analysis narrative rather than on indictments, arrest records, or public FBI identifications [1] [3].
3. How independent fact‑checkers and other outlets frame the evidence
Independent fact‑checkers and broader news coverage treat the gait‑analysis claim as unverified and lacking corroboration from primary law enforcement sources. Snopes summarized that the Blaze News‑type reporting tied Kerkhoff to the suspect based on gait similarity but underscored the absence of FBI confirmation and the failure of major outlets to independently verify the match. Other referenced materials and reporting compiled about the January 6 investigations make no mention of a publicly identified suspect named Shauna Rey and instead focus on established cases and official findings, signaling caution about accepting the gait‑match allegation as definitive without further documentation from law enforcement [1] [3] [4].
4. Competing narratives, potential agendas, and why scrutiny is high
The allegation has circulated primarily through outlets with partisan or independent investigative agendas, which elevates the need to scrutinize motives and methods. Promoters of the gait‑analysis claim frame it as exposing an internal Capitol Police betrayal, while law enforcement silence or denials are framed by others as suppression. The partisan context matters: claims emphasizing internal culpability can feed political narratives about institutional responsibility for January 6, and outlets advancing such claims may have incentives to publicize forensic results that appear conclusive even when not corroborated by prosecutorial filings or press releases. Readers should weigh the source orientation and lack of official corroboration when assessing credibility [2] [1].
5. Bottom line for readers and unanswered questions moving forward
The available, referenced materials present a serious but unverified allegation linking Shauni Rae Kerkhoff to the January 6 pipe bombs via gait analysis; however, federal authorities have not publicly named her and mainstream corroboration is absent. Key unanswered questions remain: whether the FBI conducted or endorses the gait analysis, whether it has cleared or identified Kerkhoff in closed files, and why no public charging documents have emerged if investigators believe they have a high‑probability match. Until law enforcement releases confirming information or legal filings appear, the claim should be treated as allegation, not established fact, and consumers of the reporting should track official statements and court records for verification [1] [3] [4].