When was the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act passed and who sponsored it in Congress?

Checked on December 3, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

The Smith–Mundt Modernization provisions were adopted as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 and took effect in mid‑2013; the law “went into effect on July 2, 2013” according to the U.S. Agency for Global Media [1]. The modernization began as House bills introduced in 2010 and 2012: H.R. 5729 (the Smith‑Mundt Modernization Act of 2010) and H.R. 5736 (the Smith‑Mundt Modernization Act of 2012); the 2012 version was introduced by Rep. Mac Thornberry with Rep. Adam Smith as a co‑sponsor and was folded into the FY2013 NDAA as Section 1078 [2] [3] [4].

1. A Cold‑War statute updated inside a defense bill

What is commonly called the Smith–Mundt Modernization was not a standalone, final Act passed in a single vote on its own; instead, language to amend the 1948 Smith–Mundt Act was incorporated into the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 and enacted as part of that larger law, which brought the change into effect in 2013 [5] [6]. The USAGM states the effective date of the amendment as July 2, 2013, tying the modernization’s practical start to that summer [1].

2. Who sponsored the reform in Congress

Congressional origins trace to a series of House bills. Rep. Mac Thornberry introduced H.R. 5736 — labeled the Smith‑Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 — in the 112th Congress; Rep. Adam Smith is explicitly identified as a co‑sponsor of that 2012 bill [3] [4]. Earlier, H.R. 5729 (the 2010 Smith‑Mundt Modernization Act) was introduced in the 111th Congress; reporting and archival records show Thornberry and Adam Smith as principal backers of the modernization effort across those iterations [2] [7] [1].

3. Legislative timeline and key dates

Initial introductions occurred in 2010 and 2012: H.R. 5729 was introduced in July 2010 and H.R. 5736 appeared in 2012 [7] [8]. H.R. 5736’s text and official records show a May 2012 introduction date and identify it as the Smith‑Mundt Modernization Act of 2012; that 2012 measure’s text was later incorporated into the FY2013 NDAA and enacted into law, taking effect 180 days after enactment and practically noted as effective July 2, 2013 by the U.S. Agency for Global Media [8] [6] [1].

4. What the sponsors said and the stated purpose

Sponsors framed the change as modernizing a 1948 statute to allow materials produced for foreign audiences to be made available domestically and to increase transparency — a central justification in contemporaneous statements and agency FAQs [3] [1]. The congressional summary for H.R. 5736 describes the purpose as authorizing domestic dissemination of materials about the United States intended primarily for foreign audiences [8].

5. How the record sparked competing viewpoints

The legislative vehicle — inserting Smith‑Mundt changes into the NDAA — intensified debate and led to divergent portrayals. Supporters framed the move as transparency and modernization; critics warned it effectively repealed the domestic dissemination ban and opened the door to government‑produced material being pushed to U.S. audiences. Reporting noted both the incorporation into the NDAA and the ensuing controversy over whether this amounted to a repeal of a 64‑year prohibition [4] [9]. The Broadcasting Board of Governors/USAGM and some lawmakers emphasized that the agency’s mission remained overseas even after the change [1] [10].

6. Limitations in the public record and open questions

Available sources clearly identify the bills (H.R. 5729 and H.R. 5736), the sponsors (Mac Thornberry as sponsor and Adam Smith as co‑sponsor for the 2012 bill), and the enactment timing (incorporation into the FY2013 NDAA, effective in July 2013) [2] [3] [1] [4]. Sources do not provide a single page that labels the final, standalone statute as “the Smith‑Mundt Modernization Act of 2013” outside of agency FAQs and reporting; instead, the change is documented as an amendment embedded in the NDAA [6] [1] [4]. For precise legislative maneuvering (roll‑call votes or committee reports tied solely to the Smith‑Mundt language), available sources do not mention those granular floor‑level records specific to the inserted section beyond the bill texts and post‑enactment agency FAQs [6] [11].

7. Bottom line for researchers and readers

The modernization effort began in bills introduced in 2010 and 2012 and was enacted as part of the FY2013 NDAA; agency guidance marks July 2, 2013 as the date the amendment took effect. The chief congressional sponsors named in the public record for the 2012 bill are Rep. Mac Thornberry (sponsor) and Rep. Adam Smith (co‑sponsor) [7] [3] [1] [4]. Readers should note the legislative change lives inside the NDAA text rather than as a separately enacted standalone “Smith‑Mundt Modernization Act” statute in the congressional ledger [6] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
What changes did the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act make to the original Smith-Mundt Act of 1948?
How has the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act affected U.S. government-funded broadcasting like Voice of America and Radio Free Europe?
Were there congressional debates or major objections when the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act passed in 2012?
How have journalists and civil liberties groups responded to the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act since its passage?
Has the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act influenced U.S. information policy or propaganda rules in recent administrations?