Dr. Oz warned Gov. Walz that Somali-linked Medicaid fraud could cause Minnesota to lose federal funding
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz publicly warned Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz that the federal agency could withhold Medicaid payments unless the state fixes what Oz called a systemic fraud problem that he says resulted in “over $1 billion” in improper payments tied largely to two recently expanded programs [1] [2]. Oz gave Walz deadlines (weekly updates and a corrective action plan, with 60 days noted in some reports) and said CMS “may initiate actions to withhold federal Medicaid funding” for affected program expenditures if the state does not comply [2] [1].
1. What Oz actually said and what CMS demanded
Dr. Oz framed the situation as a large-scale integrity failure and pointed to dramatic cost spikes in two Medicaid-funded programs — Housing Stabilization Services (projected $2.6 million annually but paid over $100 million in 2024, per Oz) and an autism-related Early Intensive Developmental and Behavioral Intervention program (which Oz said rose from $3 million in 2018 to nearly $400 million in 2023) — as evidence of abuse that required immediate corrective steps [1]. His letter and social posts demanded weekly progress updates, verification and freezing of high‑risk providers, a corrective action plan by the end of December (in some reports), and warned that CMS could withhold federal funding related to the 14 targeted programs if Minnesota failed to meet CMS requirements by the stated deadline [2] [3].
2. The scale claim: “over $1 billion” — how it’s reported
Multiple outlets relay Oz’s assertion that fraudsters “stole over $1 billion” from Minnesota Medicaid programs; that figure appears in many of the cited reports as a characterization coming from CMS or Oz’s public statements rather than from a single court judgment or final audit cited in these stories [1] [4] [5]. Reporting shows CMS flagged specific programs with extraordinary expenditure growth, but available sources do not present a single, consolidated, independently verified line‑item accounting that proves every dollar in the $1 billion figure was lost to criminal fraud rather than to program growth, billing errors, or other causes [1] [2].
3. Who is accused and how reporting ties the fraud to “Somali” actors
Several outlets repeat Oz’s description that “bad actors” within Minnesota’s Somali community were central to the scheme and some pieces quote more alarming claims — including allegations funds “may have even made its way to al‑Shabab” — which are advanced in opinionated and partisan outlets alongside the CMS statements [1] [6] [7]. The sources provided show Oz’s public remarks and that some outlets emphasize the ethnicity of alleged perpetrators; however, available sources do not supply complete prosecutorial findings or a comprehensive court record within these items to confirm the full scope or all alleged links to foreign extremist groups [1] [6].
4. Minnesota’s response and preexisting state actions
Minnesota officials and the Department of Human Services told local reporters they had already taken measures: the state paused payments to providers in 14 high‑risk programs, brought in an outside auditor, and said many CMS recommendations align with steps already underway [2] [3]. Governor Walz’s office and DHS emphasized cooperation with CMS and noted prior actions such as a “zero‑tolerance” posture and payment stoppages in October, according to reporting [8] [3].
5. The leverage: can CMS actually withhold Medicaid funds?
Reports quote CMS language that “may initiate actions to withhold federal Medicaid funding” tied to those 14 programs if requirements are not met — a conditional administrative authority, not an immediate unilateral cancellation of all Medicaid money for the state [2]. Some commentary pieces question the legal mechanics of withholding funds already authorized by Congress, but the reporting here shows CMS used its oversight authority to demand corrective steps and warned of possible withholding of payments for specific program expenditures [4] [2].
6. Partisan lenses and editorializing in coverage
Conservative and partisan outlets amplify Oz’s rhetoric and add political framing — tying the issue to Gov. Walz’s politics, alleged favoritism toward Somali voters, or national political attacks; local and industry outlets focus more narrowly on CMS demands and program‑level oversights [4] [6] [3] [8]. Readers should note which articles primarily republish CMS statements and which add interpretive or partisan assertions that go beyond the federal letter [1] [4].
7. What’s not established in these sources
Available sources do not present a single public, final audit or court adjudication within these articles that itemizes and legally attributes every dollar of the “over $1 billion” figure to criminal acts rather than to billing errors, program expansion, or contractual issues [1] [2]. Nor do the cited pieces include a comprehensive federal indictment or complete forensic accounting published in these stories that definitively ties all alleged proceeds to international terrorism; such links are reported as allegations or claims in some outlets but are not substantiated with court documents in the materials provided [6] [7].
Bottom line: CMS publicly demanded corrective action and warned Minnesota it could withhold federal Medicaid payments tied to specific programs if state measures fell short; the “over $1 billion” headline and claims about Somali-linked criminal networks recur across outlets but, in the reporting supplied here, rest on CMS statements, selective program data, and commentary rather than a single consolidated, court-verified accounting [2] [1] [3].