Have Soros-funded groups coordinated independent expenditures for Mark Kelly's races?

Checked on November 27, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Available sources do not show reporting that “Soros‑funded groups coordinated independent expenditures” specifically for Mark Kelly’s races; OpenSecrets records list donations from entities tied to George Soros but also state Soros Fund Management “has not reported any outside spending in the 2024 election cycle” [1]. Federal Election Commission candidate pages and OpenSecrets campaign summaries document independent expenditures and outside spending generally for Kelly’s races, but the provided material does not link coordination between Soros‑funded groups and those independent expenditures [2] [3].

1. What the public records actually show about donations to Kelly

OpenSecrets maintains detailed candidate and donor profiles for Mark Kelly across cycles, showing itemized contributions, top contributors and vendor expenditures; these pages catalog who gave to Kelly or his committees [3] [4] [5]. OpenSecrets also offers a Soros Fund Management donations profile, listing recipients and candidate recipients across the 2024 cycle, which can show if individuals or organizations tied to Soros gave to a campaign or PAC [6] [7]. These pages document contributions reported to the FEC but do not, in the excerpts provided, show a direct linkage proving coordinated independent expenditures coordinated by Soros‑funded groups for Kelly [6] [3].

2. Outside spending vs. direct contributions: important legal distinction

FEC data and summaries distinguish between funds “directly given to or spent by the candidate” and outside spending that “opposes or supports” a candidate; the FEC candidate overview for Kelly explicitly notes that independent/outside spending is not money the candidate controls [2]. That means tracing whether an outside group coordinated expenditures requires documentation beyond a contributor list — typically, filings showing independent expenditures, donor chains, or investigative reporting that alleges coordination — none of which appear in the provided snippets tying Soros Fund Management directly to such coordination in Kelly’s races [2] [3].

3. What the Soros Fund Management profiles show and do not show

OpenSecrets’ Soros Fund Management summary states the organization “has not reported any outside spending in the 2024 election cycle,” even while listing recipient data for campaign contributions [1] [6]. That phrasing suggests Soros Fund Management may have made contributions recorded under PACs or individual donor filings, but — according to the provided material — it has not been listed as an entity that ran outside (independent) expenditures in the 2024 cycle [1]. The available excerpts do not document grants from Soros entities to outside spending groups in service of Kelly’s races.

4. Where coordination allegations would need to show evidence

To substantiate a claim that “Soros‑funded groups coordinated independent expenditures” on Kelly’s behalf, reporting or public filings would need to show: (a) that an organization funded by Soros made independent expenditures in a given race; (b) that the spending was not truly independent but coordinated with the candidate or campaign (coordination is a legal standard on FEC forms and in investigations); or (c) credible investigative reporting tying donor money to operational coordination. The sources provided include FEC/OpenSecrets data on donations and outside spending totals, but they do not contain such a showing linking Soros funding to coordination in Kelly’s races [2] [3] [1].

5. Alternative explanations and competing perspectives in available material

OpenSecrets’ donor and recipient databases are primarily transactional — they document who gave and how much [6] [7]. One perspective is that donations from wealthy donors or foundations can fund organizations that independently spend in campaigns; another perspective is that lacking evidence of coordination, independent expenditures remain legally separate from campaigns. The provided FEC note about outside spending being separate from candidate funds underscores that separation [2]. Available sources do not report investigative findings that would resolve the competing interpretations in the context of Kelly’s races.

6. Limitations of the available reporting and next steps for verification

The material supplied here is limited to OpenSecrets entries, a Newsweek fundraising note, and a few ancillary items; it does not include FEC independent‑expenditure transaction detail, public filings by outside groups, or investigative journalism establishing coordination between Soros‑funded groups and Mark Kelly’s campaign. For a definitive answer, review FEC independent‑expenditure filings for Kelly’s races, look for OpenSecrets breakdowns specifically of outside spending tied to named Soros‑funded organizations, or consult in‑depth reporting that alleges coordination — items not found in the current sources [2] [1] [3].

Summary judgement based on available sources: OpenSecrets and FEC excerpts document contributions and note outside spending exists separately from candidate funds, and OpenSecrets states Soros Fund Management did not report outside spending for 2024 — but the provided reporting does not show evidence that Soros‑funded groups coordinated independent expenditures for Mark Kelly’s races [1] [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
Which Soros-funded groups have publicly supported Mark Kelly and in what capacity?
Have Soros-funded organizations legally coordinated with Mark Kelly’s campaign or reported independent expenditures?
What is the distinction between independent expenditures and coordinated campaign activity under FEC rules?
Have campaign finance filings or investigative reports shown communication between Kelly’s staff and Soros-backed entities?
How have independent expenditures influenced Arizona Senate races historically, including spending for or against Mark Kelly?