Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Were Soros-funded nonprofits involved in independent expenditure campaigns supporting Democrats in 2024?
Executive summary
Available reporting shows that George Soros and entities he funds were major backers of pro‑Democratic independent spending in 2024, chiefly by channeling large sums into super PACs and allied nonprofits; Democracy PAC received roughly $60 million in early 2024 from a Soros‑funded nonprofit and by mid‑year had taken in about $60.7 million for the cycle [1] [2]. Open Society–linked groups and Soros family vehicles also routed money to other Democratic committees and outside groups during the cycle [3] [4].
1. Big, disclosed transfers: Soros money flowed into Democratic super PACs
Federal filings and contemporaneous reporting document that a nonprofit founded and funded by George Soros donated $60 million in January 2024 to Democracy PAC, a super PAC used to boost Democratic candidates [1]. FactCheck.org summarizes FEC filings showing Democracy PAC had received about $60.7 million for the 2024 cycle, nearly all from the Fund for Policy Reform — a Soros‑linked entity — confirming that Soros family funding was a substantial, disclosed source of independent pro‑Democratic spending [2].
2. How Soros funding was deployed: both direct and routed spending
Reporting and campaign‑finance analyses indicate Soros money did not only go directly to candidates but was routed among nonprofits and super PACs that in turn funded advertising, organizing and allied groups that support Democratic aims. Congressional testimony and reporting described flows from Soros nonprofits to political committees and to groups that conduct the voter outreach and media buys typical of independent expenditure campaigns [4] [3].
3. Scope and targets: prizes and pullbacks in 2024 spending
While Democracy PAC and related vehicles were major spending conduits, some outlets noted shifts in Soros family activity over the cycle. Colorado Politics reported Democracy PAC spent about $67.5 million between Jan. 2023 and Election Day 2024 and that the Soros family reduced certain types of spending, even as Democracy PAC sent millions to mainstream Democratic committees such as Senate Majority PAC, Future Forward PAC and House Majority PAC [3]. OpenSecrets and other trackers show Soros‑linked activity is part of a broader, record‑setting “outside spending” environment in 2024 [5].
4. Not all Soros entities are the same — philanthropy versus political vehicles
Available sources distinguish between Open Society philanthropic work and separate political spending vehicles. FactCheck.org explicitly states Democracy PAC is funded by Soros and the Fund for Policy Reform, one of several Open Society Foundations, and that the latter describes itself as focused on justice, democratic governance and human rights — language that separates charitable mission from electoral advocacy even when funds overlap or move between entities [2]. Congressional materials and reporting underscore that funds sometimes flow from one Soros nonprofit to another before reaching political actors [4].
5. Transparency, “dark money” and the political debate around it
Coverage of 2024 outside spending framed Soros funding as a visible example of wealthy private funding in U.S. politics. OpenSecrets’ analysis of outside spending highlighted how dark‑money and large donors boosted both parties’ outside efforts; it notes Democracy PAC as a source of funds routed to other groups like Future Forward USA Action and ties between Open Society donors and hybrid PACs [5]. That context feeds ongoing debates: critics frame these channels as problematic for democratic transparency, while supporters say targeted independent expenditures are a lawful form of political speech [5] [4].
6. Competing viewpoints and political framing
Different outlets cast the Soros role in divergent lights. Mainstream outlets like Bloomberg and FactCheck reported factual FEC‑filed transfers [1] [2]. Right‑leaning and activist outlets often portray Soros funding as evidence of elite influence or partisan intent [6] [7], while defenders point to public filings, existing nonprofit mission statements and the legal use of super PACs and nonprofits to influence elections [2] [4]. Readers should note that partisan actors may conflate philanthropic Open Society work with electoral spending to advance political narratives [2] [4].
7. What reporting does not answer / limits of available sources
Available sources document large Soros‑funded transfers into super PACs and related spending but do not provide a complete, line‑by‑line ledger of every independent expenditure ad buy or grassroots program paid for in 2024 tied back to each Soros dollar; detailed downstream spending traces are complex and sometimes opaque in public filings [1] [4]. Also, the extent to which Alex Soros versus George Soros or different Open Society entities controlled specific strategic decisions is discussed but not exhaustively mapped in the cited pieces [3] [2].
Bottom line: public filings and reporting confirm that Soros‑funded nonprofits and family political vehicles were materially involved in independent expenditure activity supporting Democrats in 2024, principally through large donations to super PACs like Democracy PAC and subsequent transfers to allied committees and groups [1] [2] [3].