Which major U.S. elections saw measurable involvement from soros-funded organizations and what were the outcomes?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
George Soros and organizations linked to him, principally the Open Society network and associated PACs, were measurable funders in the 2015–2016 local prosecutor races and in the 2020 and 2022 national election cycles, deploying tens of millions through a web of nonprofits and super PACs; those investments produced a string of wins for progressive district attorney candidates and substantial Democratic outside spending in 2022, though successes were uneven and later met with political backlash and recalls [1] [2] [3] [4]. Reporting and campaign‑finance databases show clear flows of money and influence but differ on scale and intent, and some fringe analyses claim broader control over an “election industrial complex” without substantiated mainstream evidence [5] [6].
1. Soros and the wave of progressive district attorney victories (2015–2016 and onward)
Beginning in the mid‑2010s, Soros‑funded committees and allied state super PACs focused heavily on local prosecutor races, backing candidates who emphasized alternatives to incarceration, cash‑bail reform and police accountability; Politico and Ballotpedia chronicled that networked giving supported dozens of successful district attorney campaigns in cities including Manhattan, Los Angeles, Chicago, Philadelphia, Boston, Portland, San Francisco and St. Louis [1] [3]. These investments materially shifted local prosecutorial leadership in many population centers and are credited by several reporters with changing prosecutorial priorities, though outcomes varied—some elected reformers were later recalled or resigned amid backlash [3] [4].
2. 2020: Democracy PAC and federal election engagement
Soros created and funded national vehicles such as Democracy PAC and its successor entities to influence federal contests; OpenSecrets documents show large transfers to these PACs and individual contributions to Democratic causes in the 2020 cycle, and Ballotpedia notes Soros’s use of national super PAC structures during that contest [1] [5]. While direct candidate contributions were a small slice of broader activity, the strategic use of unlimited‑spending committees was a measurable way Soros‑linked money influenced advertising and organizing ahead of the election, according to campaign‑finance trackers [5].
3. 2022 midterms: concentrated outside spending and measurable effects
Reporting showed a concentrated injection from an Open Society‑financed nonprofit of roughly $140 million into politically active groups in 2021 that funneled support into the 2022 midterms, with major donations routed to super PACs such as Family Friendly Action PAC and Black PAC that spent heavily for Democratic congressional candidates; OpenSecrets and CNBC documents tie those flows to measurable outside spending the campaign cycle [2] [7]. News outlets and researchers identified Soros as among the largest individual donors in 2022, and many of the receiving committees then directed funds to national Democratic efforts, producing tangible advertising and organizing on battleground races [7] [2].
4. Results, backlash and contested narratives
The outcomes were mixed: Soros‑funded efforts helped elect numerous progressive prosecutors and contributed to Democratic outside spending in federal cycles, yet some local winners faced recalls or political pushback and opponents have framed the funding as undue outside influence [3] [4]. Mainstream trackers like OpenSecrets document the monetary flows and scale [5], while partisan and fringe sources allege wider conspiratorial control of an “election industrial complex,” claims that go beyond the documentation provided by campaign‑finance databases [6]. Meanwhile, recent political developments include administration‑level scrutiny and proposed investigations into groups funded by Soros, reflecting how electoral involvement has become a political flashpoint [8] [9].
Conclusion — what “measurable involvement” means here
Measured by donations, grants and PAC spending tracked in public filings and investigative reporting, Soros‑linked organizations were clearly involved in major U.S. contests: the mid‑2010s prosecutor campaigns, the 2020 federal cycle through Democracy PAC structures, and substantial 2021–22 funding that fed the 2022 midterms, producing both electoral wins and subsequent political fallout [1] [5] [2] [3]. Sources differ on motive and scale, and some claims — especially those alleging omnipotent control over elections — are advanced largely by partisan or fringe outlets rather than mainstream campaign‑finance research [6] [5]. This reporting shows influence, not inevitability: the money altered races and messaging in quantifiable ways but did not single‑handedly determine outcomes [2] [3].