What primary sources confirm Donald J. Trump’s birthdate and birthplace?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Public, contemporaneous civil records from New York City — specifically a Certificate of Birth Registration and a city “Certification of Birth” issued by the New York City Department of Health — are the primary documentary sources that identify Donald J. Trump’s date of birth as June 14, 1946, and his place of birth as Queens, New York; copies of those documents were released publicly by or on behalf of Trump and reported by mainstream outlets [1]. Secondary institutional summaries — the White House historical page, the Trump Presidential Library text, Britannica and academic profiles — repeat those facts but rely on the same civil records or public statements rather than serving as independent primary sources [2] [3] [4] [5].
1. The official New York City birth registration cited as the primary record
The clearest primary source identified in reporting is the Certificate of Birth Registration for New York City, which bears Trump’s date of birth (June 14, 1946), his parents’ names, and Queens as the place of birth; Fox News’ compilation described that city certificate and a separate “Certification of Birth” from the New York City Vital Records office as the documents Trump released to prove his U.S. birth [1]. Those New York City vital records are the contemporaneous civil records that, by law and practice, function as primary legal proof of birth when produced with the official seal and registrar’s signatures [1].
2. Copies given to media and reported as the “real” birth certificate
Contemporaneous press coverage from 2011 documented that Trump provided a copy of what was described as his “real” birth certificate to ABC News after earlier releasing a non-official hospital-style document; Business Insider reported that Trump handed ABC News the authentic document after Politico and other outlets questioned the first paper he showed [6]. That episode is important because it demonstrates that the document journalists and historians point to as primary exists in authenticated copies circulated to media — though those public copies are still reproductions of the underlying municipal record [6].
3. Institutional profiles that corroborate but do not replace primary records
Authoritative institutional biographies and repositories — including the White House historical association, the Trump Presidential Library web page, Britannica and academic profiles such as the Miller Center — consistently state Trump was born in Queens on June 14, 1946 [2] [3] [4] [5]. These are corroborative summaries based on public records or Trump’s own releases; they are reliable for confirmation but are not primary documents in themselves because they synthesize existing records and reporting [2] [3].
4. Limits, controversies, and alternative claims
Notwithstanding the civil records and copies released, controversies and gaps persist in public debate: reporting has noted that Trump declined to publish certain routine supporting records at times, and critics pointed out that one early “hospital certificate” he released in 2011 was not an official vital-records document [7] [8]. Fringe websites and conspiracy bloggers have published unfounded alternate birth claims — for example, a blog post asserting a foreign birth with fabricated documents — but those claims have been debunked by mainstream outlets and lack documentary support compared with the New York City certificates [9] [7].
5. Bottom line for what counts as primary confirmation
The primary sources that confirm Donald J. Trump’s birthdate and birthplace are the New York City Certificate of Birth Registration and the official Certification of Birth issued by the New York City Department of Health — copies of which were publicly released and reported by outlets including Fox News and Business Insider [1] [6]. Institutional biographies and government pages (White House historical summary, Trump Presidential Library, Britannica) corroborate those facts but are derivative of the same civil records [2] [3] [4]. Reporting limitations mean this review cannot independently produce the sealed original birth ledger entry from 1946; assessment here rests on the publicly released city certification documents and contemporary media reporting about them [1] [6].