What are the sources of the cocaine use allegations against Donald Trump?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The public allegations that Donald Trump or members of his family used cocaine trace to three overlapping source types: contemporaneous anonymous witnesses and later media reports about 1990s social scenes, offhand celebrity and pundit assertions during campaign events, and viral social‑media interpretations of video moments—each amplified or checked by fact‑checking outlets and partisan commentary [1] [2] [3]. Independent, conclusive forensic evidence tying Donald Trump personally to cocaine use is not presented in the reporting provided; instead the record consists of claims, denials, and competing narratives that vary in credibility [3].
1. The “Plaza Hotel” era allegations: anonymous witnesses and Daily Beast reporting
One prominent strand of the story originates with reporting that wealthy men hosted drug‑fueled parties in New York in the late 1980s and early 1990s and that some attendees told outlets they saw cocaine around events tied to the Plaza Hotel while Trump owned the property; The Daily Beast’s account, summarized by The Times of Israel, relied on attendees’ recollections and named a model who organized parties saying “there was cocaine around” but denying he saw Trump use it [1].
2. Celebrity and pundit charges as accelerants
Famous figures also injected allegations into the public conversation: actress Carrie Fisher publicly said she believed Trump used cocaine after noting his “sniffling” during a debate—her statement circulated on social platforms and entertainment sites but was an assertion from someone with a public history of drug use, not documentary proof [2]. Political opponents and commentators have made similar suggestions in campaign settings, which function more as rhetorical attacks than as evidence‑based claims [2].
3. Viral video moments and the Don Jr. “gum‑rubbing” episode
A more recent vector of allegations centered on viral video of Donald Trump Jr. at a 2024 rocket launch where viewers claimed he appeared to rub his gums—posts insinuated that implied cocaine use in the president‑elect’s presence. Those social posts spread widely until Snopes examined the footage, compared multiple camera angles, and found no evidence that he was applying cocaine, rating the specific claim unfounded absent independent confirmation [3].
4. Political tit‑for‑tat and counter‑accusations about cocaine in the White House
Allegations have moved beyond individual behavior into political theater: President Trump publicly suggested the infamous small bag of cocaine found in the White House in 2023 belonged to Joe Biden or his son, an accusation covered by Fox News reporting on his interview; that statement is a political allegation rather than a substantiated forensic attribution in the sourcing provided here [4].
5. How fact‑checking and reporting treat these sources
Fact‑checkers and mainstream outlets distinguish allegation types—anonymous reminiscences, celebrity assertions, viral clips, and political claims—and apply different evidentiary standards; Snopes, for example, explicitly found the Don Jr. video claim unsupported after reviewing available footage [3]. Broader investigative journalism pieces and summaries often place the drug‑use rumors in context of social scenes or political attacks, noting the thin trail of direct evidence linking Donald Trump himself to cocaine use in the sources provided [1] [2].
6. What the available reporting does and does not prove
The sources provided document multiple origins for cocaine‑related allegations—anonymous eyewitnesses recounting 1990s parties, celebrity commentary, viral social media interpretations, and partisan allegations about items found at the White House—but none of the cited reporting here produces forensic proof or a documented admission that Donald Trump personally used cocaine; therefore the most that can be credibly asserted from these sources is that allegations exist from varied and unevenly reliable channels, and that some specific viral claims have been debunked or remain unproven [1] [2] [3] [4].