Is the southern border in better shape than under Biden?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The analyses present dramatically conflicting assessments of southern border conditions under different administrations.
Current administration supporters claim unprecedented success: Sources report that under the current leadership, border encounters are down by 93%, with a 95% decrease in encounters with 'gotaways' and a 99.99% decrease in migrant crossings [1]. March numbers allegedly showed the lowest southwest border crossings in history with a 95% drop in daily apprehensions compared to the previous administration's average [2].
Biden administration critics present opposite data: Sources document what they characterize as a "historic border crisis" under Biden's leadership [3], with policies allegedly contributing to "chaos and disorder at the border" [4]. The House Committee on Homeland Security released a report specifically documenting the Biden-Harris administration's alleged responsibility for border deterioration [3].
Active construction efforts are underway: Current sources indicate ongoing border wall construction, including 27 miles of new border wall in Arizona and expedited construction in Texas through regulatory waivers [5], along with a new "secondary" wall to close critical gaps [6].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question lacks several critical contextual elements:
- Timeline specificity: The question doesn't specify which period under Biden is being compared, as border conditions fluctuated significantly during his term [7].
- Measurement methodology: Sources use different metrics - some focus on encounters, others on apprehensions, and others on policy approaches, making direct comparisons difficult [1] [2] [4].
- Policy approach differences: Biden's administration focused on what they termed a more "humane" approach to immigration, while facing criticism from both immigration advocates and Republican opponents [7] [5]. This fundamental difference in philosophy affects how "better shape" is defined.
- Beneficiaries of different narratives:
- Current administration officials like Secretary Noem benefit from promoting dramatic improvement statistics [1]
- Republican congressional leaders benefit from characterizing Biden's tenure as catastrophic [3]
- Immigration advocacy organizations benefit from criticizing both administrations' enforcement approaches [4]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The question contains inherent framing bias by assuming a binary comparison without acknowledging the complexity of border security measurement.
Statistical manipulation concerns: The dramatic percentage decreases cited (93%, 95%, 99.99%) in pro-current administration sources [1] [2] appear suspiciously precise and may represent cherry-picked timeframes or baseline manipulation rather than comprehensive analysis.
Source credibility issues: Several analyses come from government agencies under the current administration [1] [2] [8] [5] or partisan congressional committees [3], creating potential conflicts of interest in data presentation.
Missing independent verification: The analyses lack neutral, third-party assessments from organizations like the Congressional Budget Office, Government Accountability Office, or academic institutions that might provide less politically motivated evaluations of border conditions across administrations.