What is the status of any special counsel reviewing President Biden's actions in 2025?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The Justice Department’s formally appointed special counsel Robert K. Hur completed the investigation into President Joe Biden’s handling of classified documents and produced a report that found evidence of willful retention and sharing of classified material but concluded prosecution was not warranted, and that report has been made public and discussed in 2024–25 [1] [2] [3]. A separate Justice Department special counsel, David Weiss, whose long-running probe centered on Hunter Biden, issued a report in January 2025 that included criticism of assertions President Biden made in a December 1 pardon and played into congressional Republican scrutiny [4].
1. How the Hur investigation began and was structured
Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Robert K. Hur as special counsel in January 2023 to investigate classified documents found at Biden locations, a decision framed as necessary because of the politically sensitive nature of the matter and to preserve the Justice Department’s independence in the inquiry [5] [6] [7]. Hur, a former U.S. attorney, led a yearlong probe that interviewed more than 100 associates and included a voluntary interview of Biden himself as part of a review of material found at the Penn Biden Center and the president’s Delaware residence from his time as vice president [8] [2].
2. What Hur’s report said and the procedural status in 2025
Hur’s report, released publicly after the Justice Department completed its review, stated the investigation uncovered evidence suggesting Biden “willfully” retained and disclosed classified documents as a private citizen but concluded the Justice Department would not bring criminal charges against a sitting president, so prosecution was declined [1] [3] [2]. Attorney General Garland signaled the probe was complete and committed to releasing as much of the report as possible after executive-privilege review, and Hur subsequently provided testimony to Congress as part of oversight proceedings [9] [10].
3. David Weiss’s separate special counsel work and its 2025 report
David Weiss — originally the U.S. attorney in Delaware who led the long-running investigation of Hunter Biden — was given special counsel authority and produced a report made public in mid-January 2025 that critics and House Republicans said left unfinished questions because a presidential pardon limited further criminal avenues; Weiss’s report explicitly criticized certain assertions tied to President Biden’s December 1 pardon [4]. That report and accompanying filings became a central piece of Republican oversight hearings and fed impeachment-related narratives in the House Oversight Committee [4].
4. The political and oversight fallout shaping the public record
Both special-counsel reports have been weaponized in partisan oversight: Republicans have demanded scope memos and internal communications about the Hur probe and repeatedly contrasted Justice Department decisions in the Biden and Trump document cases, while Democrats have pushed back that the prosecutions and conclusions reflect differing facts and legal judgments [11] [8]. Congressional Republicans have used Weiss’s findings and the Hur report’s unflattering observations about memory and document-handling to press public and oversight claims even as the Justice Department declined criminal charges in Hur’s inquiry [2] [11].
5. What remains unclear and limitations in public reporting
Public reporting documents the existence, findings and public release of Hur’s report and Weiss’s January 2025 report, but some granular prosecutorial judgments, internal deliberations about privilege redactions, and the full universe of classified-material handling timelines remain visible only in the redacted reports and congressional depositions; reporting cannot conclusively fill every evidentiary gap beyond the published reports and court filings [9] [4]. Where sources offer interpretations — for example, about the political impact on 2024–25 elections or impeachment momentum — those are contestable and depend on partisan framing in the House and media [2] [4].
6. Bottom line: status in 2025
As of 2025, the special-counsel review of President Biden’s handling of classified documents led by Robert Hur is completed with a public report that declined prosecution but criticized aspects of Biden’s conduct and memory; a related but distinct special-counsel product from David Weiss addressing Hunter Biden and touching on the president’s pardon was released in January 2025 and intensified congressional scrutiny [1] [3] [4]. Congressional oversight continues, and redacted materials, testimony, and partisan narratives ensure the issue remains a live political and legal story despite the Justice Department’s decision not to indict the sitting president [9] [11].