Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What specific incidents led to Donald Trump being called an asshole?
Executive summary
Multiple recent incidents in November 2025 — notably President Trump calling Bloomberg reporter Catherine Lucey “Quiet, quiet, piggy” aboard Air Force One and angrily berating ABC’s Kimberly Bruce in the Oval Office — have generated widespread condemnation and prompted professional journalistic groups to call the behavior part of “an unmistakable pattern of hostility” toward reporters [1] [2] [3]. These episodes sit alongside a long record of sexual‑misconduct allegations and courtroom rulings that critics cite when labeling Trump with coarse epithets; reporting and legal findings note at least 25 accusers and recent upheld judgments related to sexual abuse and defamation [4] [5].
1. Why this moment blew up: the “piggy” and Oval Office confrontations
Two November 2025 episodes triggered the fresh wave of outrage: footage showed Trump point at Bloomberg’s Catherine Lucey on Air Force One and say “Quiet. Quiet, piggy,” after she pressed him about why his administration would not release Jeffrey Epstein‑related files; separately he told ABC’s Kimberly Bruce in the Oval Office not to “embarrass our guest,” called her a “terrible reporter,” and threatened ABC’s broadcast license when she asked about Saudi matters and Epstein [1] [2]. The comments prompted wide denunciations across newsrooms and a statement from the Society of Professional Journalists that these incidents are “not isolated” but part of a pattern of hostility often directed at women [1] [3].
2. How news organizations and officials framed it
Major outlets documented and condemned the Air Force One remark and the Oval Office exchange; The Guardian and AFP‑syndicated reporting highlighted both the journalist outcry and the White House’s defensive posture, with the administration insisting Trump was calling out “fake news” and defending his conduct [1] [2]. Journalistic organizations, however, emphasized the cumulative effect of repeated personal attacks on reporters and the chilling effect on press freedom [3].
3. Historical context: prior sexual‑misconduct allegations and rulings
Critics who label Trump an “asshole” often point beyond recent verbal attacks to decades of allegations of sexual misconduct. Reporting and legal documentation say at least 25 women have accused him of behaviors ranging from unwanted kissing to groping, and a jury found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation in E. Jean Carroll’s case — a $5 million judgment that was upheld on appeal and cited in later coverage [5] [4]. These earlier incidents shape the public frame through which many view his recent treatment of reporters [4] [5].
4. Broader behavioral pattern asserted by commentators
Commentators and analysts have argued that provocative, abrasive behavior is a consistent feature of Trump’s public life and governance — framing it as deliberate political strategy in some critiques [6]. Philosophical and cultural writers have also examined the label more abstractly, analyzing whether Trump exemplifies a certain type of “assholery” in contemporary politics [7]. These perspectives provide intellectual context for why the epithet is widely used by critics.
5. What supporters and the White House say in response
The White House publicly defended Trump’s “piggy” remark by asserting he calls out false reporting and gets frustrated with what it characterizes as unprofessional questions — a line echoed in official statements and briefings [1] [2]. This defensive posture frames the exchanges as partisan or adversarial press‑pool dynamics rather than evidence of misogynistic or abusive conduct [1].
6. Limits of available reporting and remaining questions
Available sources document the two November confrontations, the journalists’ backlash, and the history of sexual‑misconduct allegations and related court judgments, but they do not provide a comprehensive catalog of every incident that has led people to use the epithet “asshole.” Sources do not quantify how many citizens, officials, or outlets use that exact term or provide systematic polling tying the label directly to specific episodes beyond the cited incidents (not found in current reporting). Coverage also differs in emphasis: some outlets foreground immediate press‑freedom concerns, others foreground the administration’s legal and policy actions.
7. Bottom line for readers
The immediate wave of denunciations stems from two contemporaneous, highly visible encounters with female reporters that media organizations say fit a larger pattern [1] [3]. That pattern is reinforced in public debate by longstanding accusations of sexual misconduct and legal rulings against Trump, which critics cite when applying harsh epithets [4] [5]. Readers should weigh both the contemporaneous footage and statements from journalistic bodies against the White House’s defense and remember that different sources emphasize different strands of the record [1] [3] [4].