How do states set timelines for vacancy special elections versus appointments in 2025–2026?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
States set vacancy procedures through statutes and constitutions that give governors, secretaries of state, or legislatures the power to call special elections or allow interim appointments, producing widely different timelines across 2025–2026 depending on local law, the office at stake, and political choices by executives [1] [2]. The practical result in 2025–2026 was a patchwork: some seats were filled quickly by scheduled special elections, others waited months or were temporarily filled by appointees, and federal rules for campaign reporting added another layer of date-driven complexity [3] [4] [5].
1. How the law allocates authority — statutes, governors and writs
Most states prescribe in statute or their constitution who must act when a vacancy occurs and set the outer and inner bounds for timing: a governor commonly issues a writ or proclamation calling the special election within a statutory window and specifying the election date, and some states require the election to fall within certain days after that writ (Ballotpedia’s overview of congressional special elections shows that states either “hold an election within the same calendar year or wait until the next regularly scheduled election” depending on those laws [1]; specific gubernatorial calls such as Texas’s November 4, 2025 special election demonstrate governors exercising that statutory authority [2]).
2. Special elections versus interim appointments — two legal pathways
When vacancies occur, states generally choose between holding a special election to permanently fill the seat or allowing a temporary appointment until an election; the choice and timing are statutory. For example, the 2025–2026 cycle included numerous scheduled special elections — Florida held two House special elections April 1, 2025 — whereas other seats were filled by governor-called elections months after the vacancy, illustrating that states can pace contests differently [3] [6]. Ballotpedia’s cataloging of special elections in Congress and state legislatures underscores that timing varies by office and state rule [1] [4].
3. Calendar mechanics — primaries, runoffs, uniform dates and administrative deadlines
Practical timelines are driven by ancillary deadlines: some states require a primary or allow a “jungle” primary, others hold runoffs weeks later, and many tie special elections to preexisting uniform election dates to save cost and increase turnout, which can delay a seat being filled for months (Texas’s election calendar and filing deadlines illustrate how statutory days-before rules shape dates; Texas posts “important election dates” and filing deadlines that affect when a special contest can practically occur [7]). The Florida Department of State’s special election pages show mandatory early voting and other administrative windows that only make sense if the election is slotted into specific weeks [6].
4. Counting the real-world variation in 2025–2026
The 2025–2026 cycle was a case study in variation: Ballotpedia tracked dozens of state legislative and congressional special elections in 2025 (95 state legislative special elections scheduled in 2025 across 23 states, and dozens more listed for 2026), while specific gubernatorial calls placed some congressional contests on fall or winter dates — for example, New Jersey’s 11th Congressional District was scheduled for April 16, 2026 — underscoring how many contests are spread across months and years depending on local rules and political calculation [4] [8] [1].
5. Political and legal friction that affects scheduling
Timing is rarely neutral: governors and parties weigh partisan advantage, overlapping primaries, and even redistricting litigation when setting dates, and courts or ongoing map fights can further complicate when a contest is held (Ballotpedia notes Texas redistricting and litigation around maps ahead of 2026, which affected how special elections were run in 2025–2026 cycles) [1]. The FEC’s special-election guidance for 2025–2026 also reminds campaigns and committees that federal reporting and Federal Election Activity periods are date-sensitive, meaning that the chosen calendar affects fundraising and outreach law compliance [5].
6. Bottom line — read the statute, watch the governor, expect variation
The definitive answer is statutory: state law (and sometimes constitutions) set the mechanics and windows, governors usually call the actual dates within those windows, and pragmatic factors — primaries, runoffs, uniform election dates, cost, litigation and partisan calculation — determine whether a vacancy produces an immediate special election, a delayed contest tied to a regular election, or a temporary appointment until voters decide; the 2025–2026 landscape illustrated that variety with dozens of state legislative and multiple congressional special elections scheduled or held at very different intervals [1] [4] [8] [3].