Which states have been accused of gerrymandering in the 2024 election?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, multiple states have been accused of gerrymandering in relation to the 2024 election:

Republican-led states with significant gerrymandering accusations:

• Texas - Identified as having especially large multi-seat skews giving Republicans significant net advantage ^[1], and attempting mid-decade redistricting outside normal post-Census processes ^{[2] [3]}
• Florida - Listed among states with gerrymandered maps providing Republican advantages ^[1] and cited as having some of the worst examples of gerrymandering ^[4]
• North Carolina - Specifically identified as having gerrymandering with significant impact on the 2024 election, with Republican-drawn maps resulting in disproportionate seat allocation ^[1]
• Georgia - Also identified as having gerrymandering with significant 2024 election impact through Republican map-drawing ^[1]

Democratic-led states accused of gerrymandering:

• Illinois - Mentioned as responding with maps that skew districts in Democrats' favor ^[4] and noted for using gerrymandering to their advantage ^[5]
• California - Involved in redistricting disputes, proposing to redraw maps to counterbalance Texas' actions ^[3]
• New York - Listed among states involved in redistricting fights ^{[6] [7]}

Additional states involved in redistricting controversies:

• Missouri, Ohio, Indiana, Maryland, Wisconsin - All mentioned as states threatening redistricting actions or involved in ongoing battles ^{[6] [7]}

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks several crucial contextual elements:

• Timing and legal framework: The Supreme Court ruled that federal courts cannot intervene in partisan gerrymandering cases, giving states "increasingly unfettered power in redistricting" ^[8]. This legal backdrop explains why gerrymandering accusations have intensified.
• Competitive district impact: Only 1 in 10 districts nationwide will be competitive due to gerrymandering ^[4], demonstrating the widespread nature of the problem beyond individual state accusations.
• Bipartisan nature with asymmetric intensity: While both parties engage in gerrymandering, Republicans have been more aggressive in using this tactic ^[2], suggesting the practice isn't equally distributed across party lines.
• Reform efforts: Some states like Virginia and Arizona have implemented independent redistricting commissions to reduce partisan influence ^[5], showing alternative approaches exist.
• Mid-decade redistricting trend: Texas's attempt at mid-decade redistricting has prompted a domino effect, with multiple states considering similar actions outside normal Census-based cycles ^[7].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question itself doesn't contain misinformation but lacks important framing:

• False equivalency risk: Simply listing "accused" states without noting the asymmetric nature of gerrymandering practices could suggest equal culpability when sources indicate Republicans have been more aggressive ^[2].
• Missing scale context: The question doesn't acknowledge that gerrymandering affects the vast majority of districts nationwide, making it appear as isolated state issues rather than a systemic problem affecting electoral competitiveness ^[4].
• Temporal confusion: The question doesn't distinguish between traditional post-Census redistricting and the newer trend of mid-decade redistricting, which represents an escalation in partisan map-drawing tactics ^{[2] [3]}.

The question would benefit from acknowledging that gerrymandering accusations in 2024 represent both continuation of traditional practices and escalation through mid-decade redistricting attempts, with different levels of aggressiveness between parties and varying state responses to these challenges.