How many states have been found guilty of gerrymandering by federal courts since 2020?

1. Summary of the results

The analyses provided do not give a definitive answer to the question of how many states have been found guilty of gerrymandering by federal courts since 2020. However, several states have had their congressional or legislative maps challenged in court for gerrymandering ^[1]. According to one analysis, maps in 28 states have been challenged and 13 states have had their maps redrawn under court order ^[1]. Additionally, litigation over congressional maps in 10 states and legislative maps in 9 states remain pending at either the trial or appellate levels ^[1]. Some specific cases of gerrymandering have been reported, such as a federal court ruling that found Alabama's Jefferson County Commission redistricting plan to be an unconstitutional racial gerrymander ^[2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key piece of missing context is the lack of a comprehensive list of states found guilty of gerrymandering by federal courts since 2020 ^[1]. The analyses provided often mention specific court cases or states where gerrymandering has been challenged, but do not provide a clear count of states that have been found guilty ^{[3] [4] [5]}. Furthermore, the Supreme Court's weakening of the Voting Rights Act ^[3] and its ruling on partisan gerrymandering ^[3] are important context that could impact the number of states found guilty of gerrymandering. Alternative viewpoints may include the perspectives of states that have successfully defended their redistricting plans in court ^[1], as well as the views of advocacy groups that have challenged gerrymandered maps ^[6].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be misleading due to its assumption that a definitive answer to the question exists. The analyses provided suggest that the issue of gerrymandering is complex and ongoing, with many cases still pending in court ^[1]. Additionally, the lack of a comprehensive list of states found guilty of gerrymandering ^[1] may lead to inaccurate or incomplete information. The weakening of the Voting Rights Act ^[3] and the Supreme Court's ruling on partisan gerrymandering ^[3] may also influence the framing of the issue. Those who benefit from this framing may include states that have gerrymandered their maps ^[1], as well as partisan interests that seek to maintain their power ^[3]. On the other hand, advocacy groups that challenge gerrymandered maps ^[6] may benefit from a more nuanced understanding of the issue ^[3].