Which states have the highest rates of reported hate crimes against democrats?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
There is no reliable national dataset that reports hate crimes specifically “against Democrats,” because federal hate-crime statistics collected and published by the FBI and the Bureau of Justice Statistics do not include political party as a standard bias category, which prevents producing a state-by-state ranking of hate crimes targeted at Democrats [1] [2]. Local statutes sometimes define political affiliation as a bias category (notably the District of Columbia), but those isolated definitions do not create a consistent, comparable national measure [3].
1. What the federal data actually measure — and what they do not
The FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) hate crime program and related federal reporting compile bias-motivated incidents by categories such as race, religion, sexual orientation, disability, gender and gender identity, national origin and ethnicity, but political party is not among the standard national bias categories in the UCR hate-crime release, so the national tables cannot answer which states have the highest rates of hate crimes “against Democrats” [1] [4] [2]. International observers note the U.S. publishes annual hate crime data and has raised the priority of hate-crime work, but critiques remain about comprehensiveness and coordination—none of which changes the absence of a political-party field in the federal data [5].
2. Local law and reporting exceptions — why isolated examples won’t give a national picture
A few local legal frameworks explicitly include political affiliation among protected characteristics — for example, the District of Columbia’s Bias-Related Crime Act lists “political affiliation” as a possible bias category — but that is a jurisdictional exception, and the District’s tracking is not equivalent to a national dataset or to uniform reporting across states, so it cannot be extrapolated into a dependable national ranking [3]. Civil-society aggregators and nonprofit trackers like the SPLC and ADL maintain trend maps and state law summaries, but their resources document overall hate and extremist activity rather than providing a systematic, validated count of crimes targeted by party affiliation across all 50 states [6] [7].
3. State rankings for hate crimes exist — but they use different biases
Publicly available state-by-state tallies and rankings (from sources that aggregate FBI reports or compile open data) show which states have the most reported hate-crime incidents overall, and platforms like Data Commons or journalistic summaries rank states by count or rate of hate crimes, yet these rankings reflect the established bias categories tracked by law enforcement and do not isolate “Democrats” as a victim class [8] [9]. Independent write-ups and projections that rank states by incident counts (for example some online compilations) rely on FBI totals and modeling, but they too are silent on political-party targeting and must be read as estimates of overall hate or bias-motivated crime rather than measures of attacks on Democratic-identifying persons [10] [11].
4. Reporting gaps, undercounting, and how one could legitimately measure partisan-targeted crimes
Researchers and advocacy groups warn that official hate-crime statistics undercount incidents because not all agencies report and victims do not always identify bias to police, which complicates any attempt to measure narrowly defined categories like party affiliation even if jurisdictions began to record them [12] [5]. To establish a defensible state-level ranking of hate crimes specifically against Democrats would require (a) a standardized national field for “political party” in hate-crime reporting, (b) universal law-enforcement reporting to the UCR or a comparable consolidated database, and (c) independent validation from victimization surveys or civil-society incident logs — none of which currently exist in the federal releases provided [1] [2] [5].
5. Bottom line and recommended next steps for someone seeking an answer
The bottom line is definitive: federal hate-crime releases cannot produce a list of states with the highest rates of reported hate crimes against Democrats because political-party targeting is not a tracked national bias category [1] [2]. For a credible answer, researchers must either push for expanded national reporting standards that include political affiliation, mine local jurisdictional records where that category exists (with careful caveats), or use targeted surveys and civil-society incident collection to create a validated dataset — all steps that require policy change and rigorous methodological safeguards [3] [5] [12].