How many states are currently seeking an article v constitutional convention?

Checked on January 4, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

Reports diverge on the tally of state applications for an Article V constitutional convention because activists, opponents, and scholars count different coalitions and treat rescinded past applications differently; one advocacy group asserts 28 states have called for a convention [1] while legal-analytical reporting records roughly 27 state petitions tied to a balanced‑budget campaign and a separate 19‑state count tied to the Convention of States movement [2]. The constitutional trigger remains two‑thirds of the states — 34 — a threshold all sources agree is the requirement Congress must meet to “call” a convention [3] [4].

1. The headline number: competing tallies and what they mean

Some advocacy outlets and watchdogs present a near‑complete picture: Common Cause, an opponent of an Article V convention, reports that “28 states” have called for a convention — a framing meant to underscore how close proponents are to the 34‑state threshold [1]; by contrast, policy analysts and legal researchers break the phenomenon into separate campaigns, counting about 27 states that have applied specifically for a balanced‑budget convention and 19 states that have adopted the Convention of States Project’s broader resolution to limit federal power and impose term limits [2].

2. Why the numbers diverge: multiple campaigns, different language, and rescissions

The disagreement is not just partisan spin; it springs from real technicalities: states have passed a range of “applications” with differing purposes and text, groups sometimes add together petitions from distinct campaigns, and legal scholars dispute whether legislatures can later rescind earlier applications — a debate that changes the arithmetic of who “counts” [5] [4]. The Convention of States movement and the balanced‑budget petitioners are distinct coalitions with overlapping but not identical state support, which produces multiple legitimate tallies depending on the question asked [2] [6].

3. The constitutional yardstick: 34 is the magic number, 38 is ratification

All sources reiterate the Article V baseline: Congress must call a convention when two‑thirds of state legislatures apply — currently 34 of 50 — and any amendment proposed by such a convention would still require ratification by three‑fourths of the states to become part of the Constitution, underscoring that a call and a successful amendment are separate hurdles [3] [7] [4].

4. Who’s pushing and who’s pushing back — agendas matter

Pro‑convention organizers like Citizens for Self‑Governance’s Convention of States Project explicitly seek a convention to “limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government” and impose fiscal restraints and term limits [8] [6], while opponents such as Common Cause and other civil‑liberties organizations warn that wealthy special interests and far‑right actors are driving the effort to enshrine a particular political agenda, a claim aimed both at mobilizing resistance and framing the stakes [1] [9]. Neutral analyses from constitutional scholars and institutions stress structural uncertainties — representation rules, scope, and the possibility of a “runaway convention” — as material obstacles and reasons for caution [10] [2].

5. What reporting can and cannot establish from the provided sources

From the documents provided, the clearest, attributable statements are: Common Cause reports 28 supportive states [1]; the Brennan Center and related briefings document roughly 27 states supporting a balanced‑budget petition and 19 states endorsing the Convention of States Project [2]. What cannot be definitively established from these sources alone is a single authoritative, up‑to‑the‑minute count that reconciles overlaps, rescissions, and differing petition language — that task would require a state‑by‑state audit of current legislative texts and any rescission measures beyond the scope of these excerpts [11] [5].

6. Bottom line

Based on the supplied reporting, proponents are not yet at the constitutional threshold of 34 states; reported tallies center around the high‑20s depending on which coalition’s applications are counted (Common Cause: 28; balanced‑budget campaign: ~27) [1] [2]. The ultimate question — whether Congress must call a convention — remains legally and politically unsettled until a clear and uniformly accepted count of active, non‑rescinded state applications exists [4] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
Which 27–28 states have current active applications for an Article V convention, and which applications have been rescinded?
How do the Convention of States Project and the balanced‑budget movement differ in goals, tactics, and state support?
What legal arguments exist for and against the validity of rescinding a state’s Article V application?