What stores DO NOT support Trump and friends?
Executive summary
Growing grassroots boycotts and coordinated “blackout” actions in late 2025 specifically name a handful of major retailers — notably Target, Amazon and Home Depot — as companies activists say are supporting the Trump administration through donations, policy rollbacks, or alleged cooperation with federal enforcement [1] [2] [3]. Multiple campaigns — “We Ain’t Buying It,” “Mass Blackout,” and allied local efforts — also encourage wider avoidance of big corporations and redirect spending to small, local, and BIPOC-owned businesses [4] [2] [3].
1. What activists are asking consumers to avoid — and why
Organizers behind national and state-level campaigns publicly called for boycotts of Target, Amazon and Home Depot over the Thanksgiving–Cyber Monday period, arguing those companies have (respectively) rolled back DEI initiatives or cut support for Black-owned vendors, donated to Trump-related causes, or allowed ICE operations at stores — claims laid out by coalition leaders and local reporting [3] [2] [5] [6]. California-focused groups urged people to stop spending at “high-profile companies” they say are complicit with Trump-era policies and to redirect dollars to small businesses owned by Black, Brown and Indigenous people [4].
2. Two separate but overlapping boycott movements
Media coverage distinguishes two overlapping consumer actions: “Mass Blackout,” a broader economic shutdown urging people to halt all nonessential spending and many normal consumer behaviors for several days, and “We Ain’t Buying It,” a more targeted campaign focused on specific retailers (Target, Amazon, Home Depot) and organized by coalitions including Indivisible, No Kings Alliance and Black Voters Matter [1] [2] [3]. Both aim to pressure corporations seen as enabling the administration, but “Mass Blackout” explicitly exempts small businesses and urges donations to mutual-aid groups [2].
3. What companies are being accused of — record of the allegations
Reporting summarizes the grounds for targeting each firm: Target is criticized for rolling back DEI programs and trimming programs that supported Black-owned businesses [3] [5]; Amazon is criticized for political donations and its market power and labor practices, with specific donor links to Trump cited by organizers and local accounts [2] [5]; Home Depot is accused by organizers of allowing federal immigration enforcement to operate in its stores, a claim the company denies in coverage but which remains a rationale for boycott calls [3] [6].
4. Scale and tactics: how organizers hope to make an impact
Organizers timed actions for peak holiday shopping days to maximize economic and symbolic pressure: Black Friday through Cyber Monday is cited as the focus because of huge shopper numbers and revenue at stake — media note projections for tens of millions of shoppers and the strategic window for protest [2] [1]. Tactics include avoiding purchases, canceling subscriptions, staying off ad-driven platforms, and donating saved funds to hunger-relief or mutual-aid groups [2] [3].
5. International and historical context
The boycotts sit alongside a broader international posture since Trump's return, where some foreign consumers and businesses have avoided U.S. goods in response to tariffs and policy decisions [7]. Observers compare current consumer movements to past politicized boycotts (e.g., “freedom fries” or other symbolic consumer actions), and analysts warn that broad boycotts can have unintended consequences for prices and domestic producers [7].
6. Corporate responses and limits of the reporting
Local and national reporting records companies denying or contesting specific allegations (for example, Home Depot’s denials about cooperation with federal agents are noted in coverage), but available sources do not present a definitive legal finding that any of the named firms are formally “supporting” the administration in criminal or statutory terms — the coverage frames the case as activist claims and corporate rebuttals [3] [6]. The reporting also documents past corporate distancing from Trump-family brands in earlier years, showing the marketplace can and has shifted on perceived ties [8].
7. What this means for consumers deciding where to spend
If your goal is to avoid companies activists link to the Trump administration, current reporting identifies Target, Amazon and Home Depot as primary boycott targets and documents organized calls to avoid them during the holiday window [1] [2] [3]. Campaigns also promote alternatives — shopping locally and supporting small, BIPOC-owned businesses — and broader economic pressure through coordinated pauses in spending [4] [2]. Available sources do not offer a comprehensive, independently verified list of every store that “does not support” Trump; instead they report on activist lists, targeted campaigns, and corporate statements about their actions and ties [9] [8].
Limitations: reporting compiled here relies on activists’ public demands, local press summaries and national outlets; legal or audit-level proof of corporate “support” beyond donations, program changes, or alleged on-the-ground cooperation is not provided in the cited coverage [6] [3].