Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What were the circumstances surrounding Tara Reade's alleged encounter with Joe Biden in 1993?
Executive summary
Tara Reade has alleged that in spring 1993, while she was a staff assistant in then-Senator Joe Biden’s Senate office, Biden sexually assaulted her in a Capitol hallway — saying he pushed her against a wall and digitally penetrated her — a claim Biden has denied [1][2]. Reporting shows mixed corroboration: some acquaintances say Reade told them about harassment in the 1990s and a 1996 court filing references a complaint, while multiple former Biden staffers and news organizations found no contemporaneous corroboration or formal complaint record [3][4][5].
1. The allegation as Reade describes it — specific circumstances and timing
Reade says the incident occurred in 1993, when she was about 29 and working as a staff assistant in Biden’s Senate office; she recounts delivering or returning an athletic bag in the Capitol complex and then being attacked alone in a hallway, alleging Biden pushed her against a wall and reached under her skirt [1][2]. She has also said she filed a harassment complaint in 1993 about demeaning comments and requests — such as being asked to serve drinks at an event — although reporting finds no contemporaneous formal record of a Senate personnel complaint [6][5][7].
2. Immediate aftermath and who Reade says she told at the time
Reade told multiple people over the years that she had been assaulted, and some friends and family have said she confided in them soon after the alleged incident; for example, a former neighbor Lynda LaCasse told Business Insider she remembers Reade describing the assault in 1995–96, and Reade’s brother later said she told him at the time [4][6]. A 1996 court filing by Reade’s then-husband has been reported as referencing that she complained about sexual harassment in Biden’s office around spring 1993 [3].
3. Investigations, contemporaneous records, and disputes over evidence
Major news outlets that examined the claim in 2020 reported that investigators and newsrooms found no formal Senate personnel record of a 1993 complaint and no ex-staffer corroboration of a sexual-assault incident; the New York Times’ reporting and other outlets concluded they could not corroborate the most serious elements of Reade’s account [5][2]. Those investigations did, however, surface people who say Reade reported harassment or discomfort at the time to friends and family, and the 1996 court filing has been cited as partial corroboration [3][4].
4. Biden’s response and the broader pattern question
Joe Biden has strongly denied Reade’s allegation, saying the incident “never happened,” and his campaign noted he has a long record of supporting legislation for victims of violence against women [8][5]. News outlets noted that while several women over the years described moments of unwanted touching or close contact with Biden, reporting did not find a pattern of sexual-assault behavior comparable to Reade’s specific claim [9][5].
5. Subsequent developments and how they affect the record
Reade pursued public and legal paths after her allegation became widely known in 2020, including filing a police report in 2020 that did not name Biden and later litigation and public statements; she ultimately left the U.S. and sought Russian citizenship, saying she received threats [1][8][7]. Reporting since has amplified both the corroborating details (friends, the 1996 filing) and the lack of contemporaneous official records, leaving the factual record contested [3][4].
6. How journalists and fact-checkers framed the dispute
Fact-checkers and major news outlets laid out competing elements: Reade’s detailed account and some witnesses who say she disclosed harassment in the 1990s versus the absence of corroboration in personnel files and testimony from many former Biden staffers who said they never heard of such an incident [1][5][9]. Analysts pointed to limitations of memory and record-keeping after decades and to differing interpretations of what contemporaneous “complaints” would look like in 1993 [10][5].
7. What available sources do not mention and key limitations
Available sources do not provide a contemporaneous, named Senate human-resources file that confirms a 1993 complaint by Reade against Biden nor do they present eyewitnesses who directly saw the alleged assault [7][5]. The reporting acknowledges both the presence of people who say Reade confided in them and the significant gaps in official documentation, leaving the claim unresolved in the public record [4][3].
Bottom line: Reporting establishes what Reade alleges, who she says she told, what partial corroboration exists (friends and a 1996 filing), and that Biden denies the assault; but major outlets and former staffers reported no contemporaneous official complaint or direct eyewitness corroboration, so the detailed facts remain contested [2][5][3].