Which Texas districts were redrawn by court order in 2022 and which additional districts were remediated or enjoined in 2024?

1. Court-ordered redraws in 2022: what the record shows and what it does not

Federal litigation against Texas’ 2021 redistricting produced court-ordered changes by 2022 tied to Section 2 Voting Rights Act challenges; the consolidated case United States v. Texas / LULAC v. Abbott is the umbrella for those challenges and reflects the federal court involvement that led to remedial maps in 2022. The provided material notes that a three-judge panel had invalidated parts of Texas’ plans earlier and that updates to the consolidated litigation were recorded in 2022, indicating court-ordered relief occurred that year, but the summaries do not enumerate each specific congressional or state-house district that was redrawn by those orders. The public docket and case pages are referenced as the place where the litigation and remedial maps are tracked, signaling that court action in 2022 produced at least some map changes, though the analyses stop short of itemizing them. ^{[4] [1] [3]}

2. The Galveston County carve‑out: a concrete example that escalated in 2024

A concrete, named remedial action arising from 2022 litigation is the Petteway v. Galveston County case, where a district court concluded the 2021 map created a racial gerrymander affecting Galveston County’s Historic Precinct 3, prompting a redraw. That remedy from the 2022-era challenges proceeded into appellate activity: by 2024 the Fifth Circuit granted en banc review, placing the case on hold and elevating the dispute’s stakes for the 2024 electoral context. This example shows how local commissioners‑precinct remediations emerged from broader state redistricting litigation, and how such local orders can migrate into multi-level appellate scrutiny that affects whether the remedial map remains in force for subsequent elections. ^[2]

3. Broader 2024 activity: injunctions, stays and ongoing federal disputes

In 2024, litigation activity in Texas produced additional remedial or provisional outcomes, but the available summaries show a mix of remedies and injunctions across distinct cases rather than a single, statewide slate of enforced district redraws. The consolidated United States v. Texas / LULAC docket continued to generate updates and planned proceedings beyond 2024, including scheduling items that point to ongoing challenges to congressional and state House plans. Separate federal injunctions and stays in 2024 referenced in the analyses involve other statutes and state actions (for example, an unrelated preliminary injunction on Texas legislation and federal court responses to regulatory challenges), illustrating that 2024 saw active federal court management of multiple Texas legal disputes that affected whether particular maps or state actions could be enforced. ^{[3] [5] [6]}

4. Gaps, agenda signals, and why a full district list isn’t present in these summaries

The supplied analyses repeatedly identify the presence of litigation, consolidation of cases, and named local remedies like Galveston, but they do not provide a complete catalog of every congressional or legislative district that courts ordered redrawn in 2022 or that were later remediated or enjoined in 2024. The material includes administrative and advocacy-oriented documents (state pages, summaries) and news fragments that emphasize legal process and outcomes without granular mapping tables. That pattern suggests an information-gap driven by the nature of the sources: they report legal actions and high‑level remedies but omit district-by-district enumerations, leaving observers dependent on dockets, court opinions, and state remapping releases for the definitive list. ^{[4] [6] [1]}

5. What to consult next for a definitive, up‑to‑date list

To compile a complete, authoritative list of which Texas districts were redrawn by court order in 2022 and which additional districts were remediated or enjoined in 2024, consult the consolidated case docket pages and the specific court opinions and remedial maps in United States v. Texas / LULAC v. Abbott, the Petteway v. Galveston County filings, and the three‑judge panel and subsequent appellate opinions referenced in state and federal dockets. The provided analyses point readers to those primary court records as the source of definitive detail; relying on the underlying court orders and remapped shapefiles is necessary because the secondary summaries available here do not supply a comprehensive district list. ^{[3] [2] [4]}