Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: How do Texas voting laws compare to other states with high democratic voter turnout?

Checked on August 24, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, Texas has some of the most restrictive voting laws in the United States, which significantly impacts voter turnout compared to states with high Democratic participation. Key findings include:

  • Texas ranks among the lowest in voter turnout nationally, with only 57.9% of voting-age citizens participating and holding the second-lowest 2024 voter turnout in the nation [1]
  • Restrictive voting requirements include stricter voter ID requirements and limited mail-in voting options, which contribute to lower overall turnout [2]
  • Texas lacks same-day voter registration, a feature available in many states with higher Democratic turnout [1]
  • Early voting was reduced from three weeks to two weeks, and mail-in voting decreased, particularly affecting turnout in the state's largest cities where Democratic voters are concentrated [3]
  • Senate Bill 1 has had documented suppressive effects on voter turnout, particularly among nonwhite voters, with effects that persist for years [4]
  • Over one million people were removed from Texas voter rolls as part of election integrity enforcement efforts [5]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks several important contextual elements:

  • Federal court rulings have found that portions of Texas's voting laws violate the Voting Rights Act and the 1st and 14th Amendments, with courts determining these laws disproportionately harm people of color, those with disabilities, and those with limited English proficiency [6]
  • Redistricting battles are simultaneously occurring in Texas and other states like California, with efforts that could significantly shift the political landscape and congressional balance of power [7] [8] [9]
  • Different stakeholders benefit from various narratives: Republican officials like Governor Abbott benefit from promoting "election integrity" messaging and voter roll purges [5], while Democratic organizations and civil rights groups benefit from highlighting voter suppression concerns [4] [6]
  • The Brennan Center and other voting rights organizations have financial and institutional incentives to document and publicize voter suppression effects [4]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question itself does not contain explicit misinformation, but it frames the comparison in a way that may obscure key issues:

  • The question focuses on "states with high Democratic voter turnout" rather than examining overall voter access and participation rates, which could mask the broader impact of restrictive laws on all voters
  • The framing doesn't acknowledge that Texas's low turnout affects voters across party lines, not just Democrats, though the impact may be disproportionate [4] [6]
  • The question implies a partisan lens rather than examining voting access as a fundamental democratic right, potentially missing how restrictive laws affect nonwhite voters, disabled individuals, and those with limited English proficiency regardless of party affiliation [6]
  • Missing the redistricting context means the question doesn't capture how voting laws work in conjunction with district mapping to influence electoral outcomes [7] [8] [9]
Want to dive deeper?
What are the voter ID requirements in Texas compared to California?
How do early voting periods in Texas differ from those in New York?
Which states have implemented automatic voter registration, and how has it affected turnout?
What role do voter roll purges play in Texas, and how does it compare to other states?
How have gerrymandering efforts impacted democratic voter turnout in Texas versus other states?