Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: $10M in taxpayer funds spent creating transgender animals: Rep. Nancy Mace

Checked on February 11, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The claim about "$10M in taxpayer funds spent on transgender animals" requires significant context. While Rep. Nancy Mace cites specific figures, including $2.5M on transgender mice fertility studies and $1.1M on testosterone-treated rats [1], the actual spending and purpose of these studies are more nuanced than the headline suggests [2]. The specific NIH spending on transgender monkey research, for instance, was $477,121, not the higher figures sometimes quoted [2]. During congressional hearings, significantly different figures were presented, with Mr. Goodman claiming $241 million in spending [3], highlighting the inconsistency in reported numbers.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original statement omits crucial context about the purpose of these studies:

  • The research was specifically aimed at understanding health impacts on transgender populations, including HIV susceptibility and hormone therapy effects [4]
  • The studies had specific medical research purposes, rather than simply "creating transgender animals" as suggested [2]
  • The NIH funding was targeted at understanding health risks for transgender populations [5]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

Several potential biases and misleading elements exist:

*Terminology and Framing:

  • The phrase "creating transgender animals" is misleading, as the research was focused on medical studies rather than creation [2]
  • The White Coat Waste Project, cited as Mace's source [1], frames the research in controversial terms, describing it as "surgical mutilation" and emphasizing the controversial aspects [6]

Financial Reporting:

  • There are significant discrepancies in the reported figures:
  • $10M claimed by Rep. Mace [1]
  • $241M claimed by Mr. Goodman in congressional testimony [3]
  • $477,121 verified for specific NIH monkey studies [2]

Beneficiaries of Different Narratives:*

  • Political figures like Rep. Nancy Mace benefit from framing this as government waste
  • Research institutions and medical communities benefit from emphasizing the scientific value
  • Advocacy groups like the White Coat Waste Project benefit from highlighting controversial aspects of animal testing
Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?