What contemporary medical records exist for Trump's 1968 draft evaluation?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Contemporary official Selective Service records show Donald Trump was reclassified 1‑Y (qualified for service only in time of war or national emergency) after an Armed Forces physical on Sept. 19, 1968, with the examination result recorded as “DISQ,” and contemporaneous reporting and later investigations say the campaign cited bone spurs in both heels as the reason [1] [2]. Major news outlets and archive searches note most Vietnam‑era draft medical records were not preserved, so specific contemporaneous medical paperwork describing heel spurs has not been publicly produced and is described as “unclear and controversial” in reporting [1] [2].
1. Draft classifications and the public paper trail
The documented paper trail that is publicly available consists mainly of Selective Service classification entries obtained from the National Archives and reported by outlets such as The Smoking Gun and follow‑up fact checks: Trump received college (2‑S) deferments through January 1968, was reclassified 1‑A after graduating in July 1968, underwent an armed forces physical on Sept. 19, 1968 with the notation “DISQ,” and was reclassified 1‑Y on Oct. 15, 1968 [1] [2]. Those classification entries establish the outcome — a disqualification leading to a 1‑Y assignment — but they do not themselves include detailed diagnostic medical reports [1] [2].
2. The bone‑spur explanation and where it comes from
The explanation most often cited — that a podiatrist diagnosed bone spurs in both heels and that a doctor’s note led to the local draft board’s medical exemption — originates from Trump’s own public statements and campaign material, and has been repeated by news organizations that interviewed participants or reviewed available Selective Service files [1] [3]. Snopes and other fact checks summarize that the campaign blamed heel bone spurs for the 1‑Y classification, and reporting traces that claim through contemporaneous classification changes [1] [2].
3. Gaps in contemporaneous medical records
Multiple examinations of the record make the same practical point: many Vietnam‑era draft medical records were not preserved, and the Selective Service classification files that remain often lack the original medical documentation that would identify the diagnosing clinician or the precise clinical findings [1] [2]. Journalists who requested a copy of any written doctor’s letter from Trump were told none was immediately produced; The New York Times and others report that the Selective Service entries themselves do not specify the medical condition [3] [2].
4. Dispute and later investigations
Investigations since have dug for contemporaneous documents and testimony. Some investigative reporting — notably The New York Times in 2018 and 2019 — pursued the podiatrist who signed the note and related parties; commentators and some web sources allege impropriety or fabrication, and alternative takes assert the bone‑spur diagnosis may have been exaggerated or arranged [2] [4]. The key limitation: reporting relies on interviews, recollections, and surviving Selective Service classification entries rather than a single preserved contemporaneous medical file, and the preservation gap leaves room for competing narratives [2] [1].
5. What the available records do and do not show
Available Selective Service records show the administrative milestones: registration, deferments while a student, the armed forces physical with a “DISQ” result, and reclassification to 1‑Y — those are the contemporaneous items that survive in public archives [1] [2]. Available sources do not mention a complete, contemporaneous medical file from 1968 that explicitly documents heel‑spur diagnoses and the podiatrist’s name in an archivally preserved form [1] [2]. Claims about fraud or fabrication are reported by some commentators and sites, but those contentions rest on later testimony and interpretation of incomplete records rather than a single preserved 1968 medical record cited in the archives [4] [2].
6. How journalists and fact‑checkers treat the record
Fact‑checking outlets and mainstream reporting treat the classification entries as factual administrative records while also stressing the archival gap: they cite the 1968 physical and the 1‑Y reclassification as verified facts and label the precise medical cause “unclear and controversial” because many medical records of the era were discarded or not transferred to archives [1] [2]. Where reporters have advanced stronger conclusions about the diagnosis or potential misconduct, they have done so by combining surviving paperwork with interviews and subsequent testimony; those reconstructions are presented as investigations rather than as incontrovertible archival proof [2] [3].
7. Bottom line and open questions
The contemporaneous, verifiable administrative records show Trump was examined Sept. 19, 1968, listed DISQ, and reclassified 1‑Y on Oct. 15, 1968 [1] [2]. Whether there exists a preserved, contemporaneous medical report from 1968 explicitly documenting heel bone spurs and signed by a podiatrist is not shown in the public archive materials cited by major outlets; available sources do not mention such a preserved medical file in the National Archives or in public release [1] [2]. Because most Vietnam‑era draft medical records were not preserved, the surviving documentation leaves the medical explanation open to competing interpretations drawn from later interviews and selective surviving documents [1] [2].