Which high-profile settlements involving Donald Trump from 2020–2025 included nondisclosure or confidentiality terms?

1. The visible settlement landscape: who paid whom and why

Between 2024 and 2025 a string of multi‑million and even nine‑figure settlement items are documented: Meta paid $25 million after disputes over account suspensions, Paramount/ABC and other media companies paid settlements (e.g., $16 million to Trump’s future presidential library), and universities and elite institutions faced or struck large settlements or remedies tied to federal enforcement actions and demands — Axios and Marketplace map an approximately $1.2 billion aggregate impact across academia, media, law firms and tech, plus individual payments like $221 million associated with Columbia and other multi‑institution deals ^{[1] [2]}.

2. What the packet explicitly mentions about confidentiality or NDAs

The supplied search results do not present clear, consistent language saying any of these specific settlements included nondisclosure or confidentiality clauses. Market and political reporting in these snippets focus on dollar amounts, where settlement money is being directed (e.g., to presidential library projects or government remedies), and on institutional concessions; they do not state whether nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) or confidentiality terms were part of those deals ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

3. High‑profile individual settlements often raise NDA questions — but not here

Historically, high‑value settlements with public figures often include confidentiality provisions; however, the current packet does not confirm that pattern for Trump’s recent deals. Coverage cited here emphasizes amounts and political ramifications (for example, Trump’s reported $230 million demand from the Justice Department and corporate payouts to resolve litigation), while leaving the presence or absence of NDAs unspecified in these reports ^{[4] [3] [5]}.

4. The $230 million DOJ claim — unusual procedural issues, not confidentiality details

Multiple outlets report that Trump sought about $230 million from the Justice Department to resolve prior federal investigations and that such a settlement would face unusual ethical and procedural scrutiny because approval would lie with department officials (including some previously in Trump’s legal circle) — reporting that focuses on process and oversight risks rather than on nondisclosure terms ^{[4] [3] [5]}.

5. Media and corporate settlements: public remedies and in‑kind payments noted

Marketplace and Axios describe a mix of settlement structures: cash donations to a presidential library, free legal services from law firms to preserve government access, and large institutional commitments to funding or compliance measures. These stories emphasize public outcomes (funding, programs, restoration of federal funds) rather than secret terms; those emphases suggest public components to many deals but do not prove the absence of confidentiality clauses ^{[1] [2]}.

6. Where reporting diverges and where it’s silent

Axios frames the pattern as a coordinated extraction of concessions and value from elite institutions, implying potential political leverage ^[2]. Marketplace highlights differences between settlements paid to government entities (e.g., university settlements that resolve federal claims) versus private payouts to Trump personally. But neither piece spells out whether settlements included NDAs — an important distinction, because NDAs change what actors can say about the case even when public dollar amounts are reported ^{[2] [1]}.

7. How to interpret the informational gaps and next reporting steps

Given the lack of explicit NDA language in these sources, reporters or researchers seeking confirmation should: request redacted settlement agreements or court filings, seek comment from parties’ counsel, or check DOJ or institutional press releases tied to consent decrees or settlement orders (available sources do not mention specific filings showing NDAs here) ^{[1] [2]}. If a settlement involves government enforcement (e.g., a federal resolution with a university), public terms are likelier to be disclosed; corporate or private settlements are more often accompanied by nondisclosure language, but that general rule is not confirmed in these documents ^{[1] [2]}.

8. Bottom line for your question

The documents in this packet identify many high‑profile settlements and large sums involving Donald Trump from 2020–2025 — including corporate payouts (e.g., Meta), media settlements (Paramount/ABC), and institutional resolutions tied to federal action — but they do not specify which of those settlements included nondisclosure or confidentiality terms. To answer your question definitively, you’ll need the actual settlement agreements, court orders, or explicit reporting that cites those clauses (not found in current reporting) ^{[1] [2] [4]}.