Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How did Trump's 2024 vote count compare to his 2020 results?
Executive Summary
Donald Trump received substantially more votes in 2024 than in 2020, with multiple post-election tallies and analyses concluding a roughly 2.5 million increase in his raw vote total, producing a narrow popular-vote victory and a clear Electoral College win [1] [2]. Analysts differ on why and where those gains occurred: some emphasize broad, across-the-board percentage increases and surprising urban and minority upticks [1] [3], while others underline that the national popular-margin remained modest compared with historical winners and that gains were concentrated in populous counties and specific battleground states [4] [5].
1. The headline: 2.5 million more votes — what the tallies say and when they were published
Post-election reporting in late November 2024 and follow-up analyses through mid-2025 converge on the headline that Trump increased his raw vote count by about 2.5 million votes versus 2020. Major contemporaneous news tallies published on November 24–26, 2024 reported the 2.5 million figure and noted that Trump won a higher share of votes in every state and D.C. compared with 2020, and carried more actual votes in roughly 40 states [2] [1]. Later demographic and turnout studies in 2025 revisited those totals to place them in context — converting vote counts into percentages and turnout patterns — but did not dispute the basic up‑tick in Trump’s raw votes [3]. The numeric increase is the consistent, documented baseline across these sources.
2. Margin vs. count: a narrow popular‑vote victory amid a decisive Electoral College result
Although Trump’s raw vote total rose by millions, his margin in the national popular vote was relatively small, reported between about 1.5 and 1.62 percentage points in contemporaneous fact checks and national summaries [4] [3]. PolitiFact and other late‑November analyses highlighted that the popular‑vote margin was modest by historical standards — smaller than many recent winners — even as Trump secured wider margins in several key battlegrounds that delivered a decisive Electoral College win [4]. That divergence — big raw gains but a tight percentage margin — is explained by lower nationwide turnout than 2020 and concentrated vote shifts in pivotal geographies [2] [5].
3. Geography of gains: populous counties and the “blue wall” reversal
County‑level studies and media analyses point to concentrated gains in highly populated counties and in the industrial Northeast and Midwest, shifting the map back toward Republicans in places Biden won in 2020. Multiple analyses noted improved Republican performance in large urban counties (including Detroit, Milwaukee and Philadelphia metro counties), double‑digit swings in certain border and southern Florida counties, and larger margins across seven battleground states that collectively contributed hundreds of thousands of votes to Trump’s total [1] [6] [4]. Other research shows that gains were larger in the “top half” of counties by population than in smaller counties, meaning Trump’s improvements were especially pronounced where more voters live [5]. The spatial pattern matters: winning populous counties by more can boost raw totals without producing a landslide national percentage.
4. Demographics: who shifted and what the surveys show
Surveys and post‑election analyses published through June 2025 indicate measurable shifts among demographic groups. Pew’s June 2025 analysis estimated Trump rose to about 49.8% of the national vote versus 46.9% in 2020, finding he retained a high share of his 2020 supporters and picked up a nontrivial share of former Biden voters and new/returning voters; it also reported improvements among Black and Latino voters, especially younger Black men, which helped in key jurisdictions [3] [1]. Other studies described a narrowing but still meaningful retention gap between the major tickets — for instance, Trump holding roughly 85% of his 2020 voters while the Democratic ticket retained about 79%, shifting the net vote balance in several swing areas [3]. These demographic nudges, while not uniform, aggregated into the national vote swing.
5. Competing framings and what’s still unresolved
Post‑election narratives diverge: one framing stresses a broad, across‑the‑board Republican surge and Trump’s gains in unexpected urban and minority areas [1] [7], while a counterpoint emphasizes that the victory was narrow in popular terms and driven largely by swings in specific battlegrounds and populous counties rather than a uniform nationwide realignment [4] [5]. Methodological differences — whether analysts count raw votes, percentage shifts, county‑level weighting, or turnout baselines — produce different emphases. The settled facts are the vote totals and documented county swings; the interpretation of long‑term political realignment versus a unique 2024 coalition remains an active analytical question requiring further longitudinal study [8] [7].