The immigration and ice raids that trump has sent out?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Since January 2025 the Trump administration has dramatically increased ICE workplace and community raids, with ICE signing more than 1,100 287(g) agreements across forty states and conducting some very large single‑site operations (for example, about 475 arrests at a Hyundai battery plant in Georgia) while DHS officials say they are pursuing a goal of mass deportations approaching roughly a million per year; local resistance and legal pushback have limited some operations and complicated enforcement [1] [2] [3] [4]. Reporting also shows detention populations and arrests have surged — detention rose about 70% to almost 66,000 by November 2025 and ICE was on pace for hundreds of thousands of removals in 2025 — and critics point to aggressive tactics and sweeping criteria that snare many people without criminal convictions [5] [6] [7].
1. A nationwide ramp‑up: policy and scale
The second Trump administration has made a strategic choice to prioritize quantity of arrests and broad enforcement actions: the White House and DHS have pushed ICE to expand raids, large worksite operations restarted in January 2025, and the agency has vastly increased formal partnerships with local law enforcement under Section 287(g) — from roughly 135 agreements in December 2024 to more than 1,100 by November 2025 — enabling local officers to carry out immigration functions and amplifying reach into communities [2] [1] [8].
2. High‑profile raids and what they mean on the ground
Enforcement has included both traditional workplace sweeps and dramatic single‑site actions. ICE’s September 2025 raid at a Hyundai battery plant in Georgia detained about 475 people — a DHS‑called largest single‑site worksite enforcement — and other operations have led to dozens or hundreds of arrests at construction sites and meatpacking plants, showing the administration’s willingness to target a range of industries [2]. Those operations have been replicated in cities including Los Angeles, Chicago, Charlotte and New Orleans, producing surges of arrests in targeted locales [9].
3. Arrest profiles and detention pressures
Multiple outlets document that a large share of people ICE is booking now lack criminal convictions: more than 75% of people booked in fiscal 2025 had no criminal conviction beyond immigration or traffic offenses according to ICE records cited by CNN; Reuters and other reporting show ICE detention populations rose roughly 70% to almost 66,000 by November 2025, and voluntary departures while detained increased sharply — indicators of growing detention pressure and coercive incentives to abandon legal cases [6] [5].
4. Tactics, community harm and civil‑rights concerns
Journalists and former ICE officials say enforcement tactics have become more aggressive and sweeping. Former ICE leadership and reporting describe pressure on agents to boost arrest counts and the adoption of broader, more indiscriminate sweeps; critics and witnesses describe aggressive field tactics and instances where agents held people at gunpoint or used crowd‑control measures during protests, with trackers documenting shootings and other violent encounters tied to enforcement actions [4] [6] [10].
5. Local pushback, legal limits and political friction
Cities and mayors have responded in varied ways: sanctuary jurisdictions are preparing emergency aid, limiting cooperation, and seeking legal avenues to shield residents, while the federal government has countered by expanding 287(g) deals and funding local partnerships; Axios documents mayors’ efforts to blunt raids without breaching federal obstruction laws, and some local law enforcement have refused to provide ICE access to jails or facilities, creating a patchwork of enforcement outcomes [3] [9] [1].
6. The administration’s goals versus operational realities
Federal officials have framed the campaign as a push toward mass deportations, with public targets and rhetoric about a brisk removal pace; but watchdogs and analysts note that despite high arrest counts and pressure to reach targets (reports say White House staff urged escalation to thousands of community arrests per day), local resistance, legal challenges, and logistical limits shape results and sometimes blunt the administration’s stated ambitions [11] [1] [6].
7. Evidence gaps and contested claims
Available sources document large increases in arrests, detention, and 287(g) expansion as well as specific large raids and numerous incidents of force. Sources differ on motives and characterization: DHS and ICE defend agents’ conduct while former agency officials and civil‑rights groups call the tactics unprecedented and quantity‑driven [6] [4]. Available sources do not mention detailed internal White House memos authorizing each raid beyond reporting on pressure to escalate arrests and public statements about deportation goals [11] [1].
Takeaway: reporting across outlets — policy analysts, national press and advocacy groups — consistently shows a deliberate, large‑scale intensification of immigration enforcement under Trump in 2025, powered both by high‑profile raids and by a paperwork‑driven expansion of local cooperation. That dual strategy raises immediate civil‑rights and community‑stability questions and has provoked widespread local resistance [8] [2] [3].