Trumps 34 felony convictions dropped?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The 34 felony convictions linked to the New York “hush-money” case have not been unilaterally “dropped”; a Manhattan jury found Donald Trump guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records in May 2024, and sentencing and appeals have produced a complex legal landscape rather than a simple erasure of the verdict [1]. Federal criminal matters brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith were discontinued after Trump’s 2024 election victory, but that procedural outcome is separate from the New York state conviction and its ongoing appellate litigation [2] [3].
1. The conviction that produced 34 felony counts — what happened in New York
A Manhattan jury convicted Trump on 34 counts of first‑degree falsifying business records tied to payments made before the 2016 election; that verdict came on May 30, 2024, and led to sentencing proceedings that were held in early January 2025 [1]. Court rulings through late 2024 and early 2025, including refusals by higher courts to stay sentencing, left the conviction intact while defense teams pursued appeals and motions to vacate [1].
2. Sentencing, “unconditional discharge,” and what that means in the record
Some public sources report that on January 10, 2025, Trump received an “unconditional discharge” of his sentence in the New York case [4]. That phrase signals a particular sentencing outcome recorded in public summaries [4], but summaries alone do not erase the underlying jury verdict; the conviction remains on the docket while appellate challenges proceed unless a court formally overturns it or a higher court orders a different remedy [1]. The provided documents do not supply a full district‑court order explaining the discharge or its legal basis, so the precise practical effect and whether it constitutes a final nullification of the convictions is not fully documented in these sources [4] [1].
3. Federal cases were dropped after the election — a separate thread
Charges brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith in federal matters — notably the election‑subversion and classified‑documents cases — were moved off the table after Trump won reelection, since longstanding DOJ policy generally forecloses indicting a sitting president; Smith moved to drop those federal cases in November 2024 and wound down appeals tied to them afterward [2] [3]. Those federal dismissals are often conflated in reporting with the New York state case, but they are distinct legal proceedings in different jurisdictions and do not by themselves vacate a state conviction [2] [3].
4. Appeals strategy and realistic paths to vacatur or removal of the convictions
Defense teams have pursued aggressive appellate strategies, including seeking to transfer the New York appeal into the federal system or to argue that Supreme Court immunity rulings should nullify portions of the case; appellate panels have signaled openness to federal‑court consideration, which could ultimately open a path to vacating convictions if a court concludes evidence was tainted by presidential‑act immunity issues [5]. Legal analysts note that moving a conviction from state to federal forum or obtaining reversal on immunity grounds would be procedurally complex and uncertain; the reporting indicates appellate arguments were ongoing and that various courts had not yet produced a definitive, dispositive reversal in the New York matter as of these sources [5] [1].
5. Bottom line and reporting limits
Based on the assembled reporting, the 34 New York felony convictions were not simply “dropped” in the way federal prosecutions were ended after the election; the New York guilty verdict stands on the record, subject to sentencing outcomes and active appeals that could alter its status, and summaries that mention an “unconditional discharge” do not by themselves resolve the question of whether the convictions have been legally vacated [1] [4]. The documents provided do not include a complete appellate decision vacating the verdict or a state court order formally dismissing those 34 counts, so a definitive statement that the convictions were dropped would exceed what these sources verify [4] [1].