Did trump rate children’s genitalia by putting his fingers in them
Executive summary
The newly released Epstein-related documents include anonymous, uncorroborated tips that accuse Donald Trump of abhorrent conduct — including a claim that he “measured the children’s vulva and vaginas by entering a finger and rated the children on tightness” — but those items are tips in an FBI spreadsheet, not proven facts, and there are no credible criminal charges for child molestation against Trump arising from those documents [1] [2] [3].
1. What the documents actually say and where the language came from
A tranche of files tied to Jeffrey Epstein published by the Justice Department and summarized in media reporting contains numerous tips and complaint summaries sent to the FBI’s National Threat Operations Center, and some of those entries specifically reference allegations about Trump, including a spreadsheet item that reportedly says a person accused Trump of invasive sexual acts against children and described measuring and “rating” them; those claims appear in multiple news accounts and tabloid retellings of the released materials [2] [1] [4].
2. The status of those claims under journalistic and legal standards
News organizations that have reviewed the materials (and outlets that republished sensational language) treat these items as uncorroborated tips in the FBI files rather than established criminal findings; Reuters’ fact-checking emphasizes that there are no credible news reports of child molestation charges against Trump, underscoring that tip-sheet allegations are not the same as substantiated evidence or indictments [3] [2].
3. How major outlets and officials have framed the allegations
Some outlets — from mainstream investigative outlets noting the presence of allegations to tabloids that used graphic phrasing — reported the entries while noting limited corroboration, and the Department of Justice itself has previously warned that earlier releases included “untrue and sensationalist” claims submitted to the FBI, with DOJ commentary pointing out that Epstein’s own communications did not allege criminal contact by Trump with victims [2] [4] [1].
4. Corroboration, follow-up, and court records: what’s been produced so far
Reporting shows that at least one complaint in the released files described an alleged rape of a 13–14-year-old girl and other callers made dramatic claims, but outlets and FOIA releases indicate the FBI’s follow-up was often limited, that many tips were anonymous or unverifiable, and that no corroborated criminal case arising from those tips against Trump has been produced in public court records [5] [6] [2].
5. Competing narratives, misinformation risks, and motives for amplification
The appearance of lurid allegations in raw government documents created an environment primed for rapid amplification: partisan actors and tabloids can weaponize unvetted claims, while fact-checkers and officials caution readers about treating tip-sheet content as proven wrongdoing; a recent high-profile retraction on cable news about Trump’s involvement in a trafficking ring illustrates how easily assertions can outpace verification [7] [4] [3].
6. Bottom line: can it be stated as fact that Trump measured and rated children’s genitals?
The public record assembled from the released Epstein-related documents shows that such an allegation exists as an uncorroborated entry in FBI files and was reported by several outlets, but there is no publicly available corroboration or criminal charge that establishes the claim as fact; accordingly, the allegation should be reported as an unverified tip in the documents, not as a proven action by Trump [1] [2] [3].