Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How does Donald Trump's approval rating compare to other presidents at the same point in their term?
1. Summary of the results
Based on the analyses provided, Donald Trump consistently ranks as having among the lowest approval ratings compared to other presidents at similar points in their terms. According to Gallup's historical analysis, Trump's approval ratings in the first July of both of his terms are lower than those of any other modern president [1]. Multiple sources confirm that Trump holds the position as the lowest-rated new president since 1953, with this pattern consistent across both his first and second terms [2] [3].
The data shows that Trump's initial job approval rating at the start of his second term mirrors what it was at the beginning of his first term, reinforcing his historically low standing [2] [3]. While most presidents since polling began have started their terms with positive net approval ratings, both of Trump's terms began with mixed reviews [4]. His current net approval rating has fallen to -15 [2].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The analyses reveal several gaps in providing comprehensive comparative context:
- Lack of specific numerical comparisons: While the sources establish Trump's position as the lowest-rated new president since 1953, they don't provide detailed numerical breakdowns showing exactly how his ratings compare to specific predecessors like Biden, Obama, Bush, Clinton, or Reagan at equivalent time periods [4] [5].
- Limited timeframe analysis: The sources focus primarily on initial approval ratings and first July ratings but don't provide broader temporal comparisons throughout presidential terms [1].
- Missing methodology details: The analyses don't explain the specific polling methodologies or sample sizes used in these historical comparisons, which could affect the reliability of cross-temporal comparisons [6].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question itself appears neutral and factual in nature, simply requesting comparative data on presidential approval ratings. There is no apparent bias or misinformation in asking for this type of historical comparison. The question seeks objective, measurable data that can be verified through established polling organizations like Gallup.
However, the incomplete nature of the source analyses could potentially lead to misunderstanding, as they provide conclusory statements about Trump's low ratings without offering the full comparative dataset that would allow for comprehensive analysis across different presidencies and time periods.